Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Add ClusterAwareBuilderWithOptions to the wrapper #26

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 4, 2022

Conversation

fgiloux
Copy link

@fgiloux fgiloux commented Sep 28, 2022

This adds a wrapper ClusterAwareBuilderWithOptions to the BuilderWithOptions function of controller-runtime. This wrapper calls
NewClusterAwareCache instead of New.
This allows the use of cache options by cluster aware controllers.

Fixes #25

Signed-off-by: Frederic Giloux fgiloux@redhat.com

Signed-off-by: Frederic Giloux <fgiloux@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Sep 28, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 28, 2022

Hi @fgiloux. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kcp-dev member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@fgiloux
Copy link
Author

fgiloux commented Sep 28, 2022

As we don't have better documentation today and operator authors rely on the controller-runtime-example for guidance I would propose to add 2 lines of comment to its main.go after this PR. Something like

// If a custom cache is created it needs to be cluster aware. For the purpose
// kcp.ClusterAwareBuilderWithOptions can be used instead of cache.BuilderWithOptions
mgr, err = kcp.NewClusterAwareManager(cfg, options)

What do you think?

@fgiloux
Copy link
Author

fgiloux commented Oct 4, 2022

@varshaprasad96 @stevekuznetsov would you mind reviewing this PR?

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 4, 2022
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 4, 2022

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ncdc

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 4, 2022
@ncdc
Copy link
Member

ncdc commented Oct 4, 2022

/ok-to-test

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 4, 2022
Copy link

@varshaprasad96 varshaprasad96 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/retest

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit a02083d into kcp-dev:kcp-1.24 Oct 4, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Controller-runtime and custom cache
4 participants