Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow using simple queue names in aws sqs scaler #2483

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 24, 2022

Conversation

nicolaferraro
Copy link
Contributor

@nicolaferraro nicolaferraro commented Jan 14, 2022

AWS SQS autoscaler does not really need a full queueURL, it also works with simple queue names, but there was some code that tried to parse the URL to get the queue name for building a metric ID.

The example in the doc already uses a simple name.

Checklist

  • Commits are signed with Developer Certificate of Origin (DCO - learn more)
  • Tests have been added
  • A PR is opened to update our Helm chart (repo) (if applicable, ie. when deployment manifests are modified)
  • A PR is opened to update the documentation on (repo) (if applicable)
  • Changelog has been updated

Fixes #

@nicolaferraro nicolaferraro requested a review from a team as a code owner January 14, 2022 08:56
@nicolaferraro nicolaferraro force-pushed the sqs-queueurl branch 3 times, most recently from 3bec0ca to 0f269f3 Compare January 14, 2022 14:52
@JorTurFer
Copy link
Member

JorTurFer commented Jan 16, 2022

Hi @nicolaferraro ,
Have you tried this? I feel that the PR will not work with simple queues because the function GetAwsSqsQueueLength still uses queueURL but probably I'm wrong (I don't know in depth about AWS SDK)

@tomkerkhove
Copy link
Member

I see you've checked " A PR is opened to update the documentation on (repo) (if applicable)" but I don't see a PR on https://github.com/kedacore/keda-docs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-desc. Would you mind updating the docs for 2.6 please?

@nicolaferraro
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, I thought it wasn't required, but I've opened this: kedacore/keda-docs#628.

Sure, I've tested it manually and using the new integration I've created in Camel K.

Signed-off-by: nicolaferraro <ni.ferraro@gmail.com>
JorTurFer
JorTurFer previously approved these changes Jan 17, 2022
Copy link
Member

@JorTurFer JorTurFer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!
Thanks for your contribution ❤️

@JorTurFer JorTurFer requested a review from a team January 17, 2022 14:49
@tomkerkhove
Copy link
Member

Added concern on doc PR given we are re-using the queueURL name for a queue name: kedacore/keda-docs#628 (comment)

@JorTurFer JorTurFer dismissed their stale review January 17, 2022 14:58

Pending comments about naming in docs

Copy link
Member

@zroubalik zroubalik left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

@zroubalik zroubalik added this to the v2.6.0 milestone Jan 24, 2022
@zroubalik zroubalik merged commit be3d926 into kedacore:main Jan 24, 2022
markrzasa pushed a commit to markrzasa/keda that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2022
Signed-off-by: nicolaferraro <ni.ferraro@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rzasa <mark.rzasa@gmail.com>
markrzasa pushed a commit to markrzasa/keda that referenced this pull request Jan 27, 2022
Signed-off-by: nicolaferraro <ni.ferraro@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Mark Rzasa <mark.rzasa@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants