Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

libbpf: Simplify the find_elf_sec_sz() function #67

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

libbpf: Simplify the find_elf_sec_sz() function #67

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

kernel-patches-bot
Copy link

Pull request for series with
subject: libbpf: Simplify the find_elf_sec_sz() function
version: 1
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617046

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: b4f7278
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617046
version: 1

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: a19df71
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617054
version: 1

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 08894d9
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617054
version: 1

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=617054 irrelevant now. Closing PR.

@kernel-patches-bot kernel-patches-bot deleted the series/617046=>bpf-next branch February 23, 2022 23:16
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
47ef389 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

fentry before bpf trampoline hooked:
 mov x9, x30
 nop

fentry after bpf trampoline hooked:
 mov x9, x30
 bl  <bpf_trampoline>

Tested on qemu, result:
 #55 fentry_fexit:OK
 #56 fentry_test:OK
 #58 fexit_sleep:OK
 #59 fexit_stress:OK
 #60 fexit_test:OK
 #67 get_func_args_test:OK
 #68 get_func_ip_test:OK
 #101 modify_return:OK

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
2e0a6e5 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

fentry before bpf trampoline hooked:
 mov x9, x30
 nop

fentry after bpf trampoline hooked:
 mov x9, x30
 bl  <bpf_trampoline>

Tested on qemu, result:
 #55 fentry_fexit:OK
 #56 fentry_test:OK
 #58 fexit_sleep:OK
 #59 fexit_stress:OK
 #60 fexit_test:OK
 #67 get_func_args_test:OK
 #68 get_func_ip_test:OK
 #101 modify_return:OK

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 13, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
8db3e41 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

fentry before bpf trampoline hooked:
 mov x9, x30
 nop

fentry after bpf trampoline hooked:
 mov x9, x30
 bl  <bpf_trampoline>

Tested on qemu, result:
 #55 fentry_fexit:OK
 #56 fentry_test:OK
 #58 fexit_sleep:OK
 #59 fexit_stress:OK
 #60 fexit_test:OK
 #67 get_func_args_test:OK
 #68 get_func_ip_test:OK
 #101 modify_return:OK

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
9755aca 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

fentry before bpf trampoline hooked:
 mov x9, x30
 nop

fentry after bpf trampoline hooked:
 mov x9, x30
 bl  <bpf_trampoline>

Tested on qemu, result:
 #55 fentry_fexit:OK
 #56 fentry_test:OK
 #58 fexit_sleep:OK
 #59 fexit_stress:OK
 #60 fexit_test:OK
 #67 get_func_args_test:OK
 #68 get_func_ip_test:OK
 #101 modify_return:OK

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
fc20dd2 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

fentry before bpf trampoline hooked:
 mov x9, x30
 nop

fentry after bpf trampoline hooked:
 mov x9, x30
 bl  <bpf_trampoline>

Tested on qemu, result:
 #55 fentry_fexit:OK
 #56 fentry_test:OK
 #58 fexit_sleep:OK
 #59 fexit_stress:OK
 #60 fexit_test:OK
 #67 get_func_args_test:OK
 #68 get_func_ip_test:OK
 #101 modify_return:OK

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
3969339 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

fentry before bpf trampoline hooked:
 mov x9, x30
 nop

fentry after bpf trampoline hooked:
 mov x9, x30
 bl  <bpf_trampoline>

Tested on qemu, result:
 #55 fentry_fexit:OK
 #56 fentry_test:OK
 #58 fexit_sleep:OK
 #59 fexit_stress:OK
 #60 fexit_test:OK
 #67 get_func_args_test:OK
 #68 get_func_ip_test:OK
 #101 modify_return:OK

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
627ebd4 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

fentry before bpf trampoline hooked:
 mov x9, x30
 nop

fentry after bpf trampoline hooked:
 mov x9, x30
 bl  <bpf_trampoline>

Tested on qemu, result:
 #18  bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51  dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55  fentry_fexit:OK
 #56  fentry_test:OK
 #57  fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58  fexit_sleep:OK
 #59  fexit_stress:OK
 #60  fexit_test:OK
 #67  get_func_args_test:OK
 #68  get_func_ip_test:OK
 #101 modify_return:OK
 #233 xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 17, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
7b98d99 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
3d2e901 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
d8b56b9 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 19, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
f53019e 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
3a9cc39 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
a9665dd 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
1f8504b 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
8a074a2 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
428b70d 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 20, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
76e96b0 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
effbfe1 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
14cc7a0 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 21, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
7fa9691 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
b3903ac 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
d60f9e5 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
814dbda 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
b7ea4a3 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
aa7cf9d 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
8bcc0b2 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request May 23, 2022
bpf, arm64: bpf trampoline for arm64
27056d7 
Add bpf trampoline support for arm64. Most of the logic is the same as
x86.

Tested on raspberry pi 4b and qemu with KASLR disabled (avoid long jump),
result:
 #9  /1     bpf_cookie/kprobe:OK
 #9  /2     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api:FAIL
 #9  /3     bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api:FAIL
 #9  /4     bpf_cookie/uprobe:OK
 #9  /5     bpf_cookie/tracepoint:OK
 #9  /6     bpf_cookie/perf_event:OK
 #9  /7     bpf_cookie/trampoline:OK
 #9  /8     bpf_cookie/lsm:OK
 #9         bpf_cookie:FAIL
 #18 /1     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:OK
 #18 /2     bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:OK
 #18 /3     bpf_tcp_ca/invalid_license:OK
 #18 /4     bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:OK
 #18 /5     bpf_tcp_ca/rel_setsockopt:OK
 #18        bpf_tcp_ca:OK
 #51 /1     dummy_st_ops/dummy_st_ops_attach:OK
 #51 /2     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ret_value:OK
 #51 /3     dummy_st_ops/dummy_init_ptr_arg:OK
 #51 /4     dummy_st_ops/dummy_multiple_args:OK
 #51        dummy_st_ops:OK
 #55        fentry_fexit:OK
 #56        fentry_test:OK
 #57 /1     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_no_callees:OK
 #57 /2     fexit_bpf2bpf/target_yes_callees:OK
 #57 /3     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace:OK
 #57 /4     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_verify:OK
 #57 /5     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_sockmap_update:OK
 #57 /6     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_return_code:OK
 #57 /7     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_map_prog_compatibility:OK
 #57 /8     fexit_bpf2bpf/func_replace_multi:OK
 #57 /9     fexit_bpf2bpf/fmod_ret_freplace:OK
 #57        fexit_bpf2bpf:OK
 #58        fexit_sleep:OK
 #59        fexit_stress:OK
 #60        fexit_test:OK
 #67        get_func_args_test:OK
 #68        get_func_ip_test:OK
 #104       modify_return:OK
 #237       xdp_bpf2bpf:OK

bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_link_api and bpf_cookie/multi_kprobe_attach_api
failed due to lack of multi_kprobe on arm64.

Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Song Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Acked-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 26, 2022
@melissawen @alexdeucher
drm/amd/display: set panel orientation before drm_dev_register
acc96ae 
To set the panel orientation property with quirk, we need the mode size
provided by EDID. This info is available after EDID is read by dc_link_detect()
and updated by amdgpu_dm_update_connector_after_detect(). The detection
happens at driver load in amdgpu_dm_initialize_drm_device() and,
therefore, we can get modes and set panel orientation before
drm_dev_register() to avoid DRM warns on creating the connector property
after device registration:

[    2.563969] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    2.563971] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 325 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c:45 drm_mode_object_add+0x72/0x80 [drm]
[    2.563997] Modules linked in: btusb btrtl btbcm btintel btmtk bluetooth rfkill ecdh_generic ecc usbhid crc16 amdgpu(+) drm_ttm_helper ttm agpgart gpu_sched i2c_algo_bit drm_display_helper drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm serio_raw sdhci_pci atkbd libps2 cqhci vivaldi_fmap ccp sdhci i8042 crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul hid_multitouch ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel crypto_simd cryptd wdat_wdt mmc_core cec xhci_pci sp5100_tco rng_core xhci_pci_renesas serio 8250_dw i2c_hid_acpi i2c_hid btrfs blake2b_generic libcrc32c crc32c_generic crc32c_intel xor raid6_pq dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod pkcs8_key_parser crypto_user
[    2.564032] CPU: 6 PID: 325 Comm: systemd-udevd Not tainted 5.18.0-amd-staging-drm-next+ #67
[    2.564034] Hardware name: Valve Jupiter/Jupiter, BIOS F7A0105 03/21/2022
[    2.564036] RIP: 0010:drm_mode_object_add+0x72/0x80 [drm]
[    2.564053] Code: f0 89 c3 85 c0 78 07 89 45 00 44 89 65 04 4c 89 ef e8 e2 99 04 f1 31 c0 85 db 0f 4e c3 5b 5d 41 5c 41 5d c3 80 7f 50 00 74 ac <0f> 0b eb a8 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 44 00 00 41 54 4c
[    2.564055] RSP: 0018:ffffb2e880413860 EFLAGS: 00010202
[    2.564056] RAX: ffffffffc0ba1440 RBX: ffff99508a860010 RCX: 0000000000000001
[    2.564057] RDX: 00000000b0b0b0b0 RSI: ffff99508c050110 RDI: ffff99508a860010
[    2.564058] RBP: ffff99508c050110 R08: 0000000000000020 R09: ffff99508c292c20
[    2.564059] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: ffff99508c0507d8 R12: 00000000b0b0b0b0
[    2.564060] R13: 0000000000000004 R14: ffffffffc068a4b6 R15: ffffffffc068a47f
[    2.564061] FS:  00007fc69b5f1a40(0000) GS:ffff9953aff80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[    2.564063] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[    2.564063] CR2: 00007f9506804000 CR3: 0000000107f92000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0
[    2.564065] Call Trace:
[    2.564068]  <TASK>
[    2.564070]  drm_property_create+0xc9/0x170 [drm]
[    2.564088]  drm_property_create_enum+0x1f/0x70 [drm]
[    2.564105]  drm_connector_set_panel_orientation_with_quirk+0x96/0xc0 [drm]
[    2.564123]  get_modes+0x4fb/0x530 [amdgpu]
[    2.564378]  drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes+0x1ad/0x850 [drm_kms_helper]
[    2.564390]  drm_client_modeset_probe+0x229/0x1400 [drm]
[    2.564411]  ? xas_store+0x52/0x5e0
[    2.564416]  ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x177/0x2c0
[    2.564420]  __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x44/0x4e0 [drm_kms_helper]
[    2.564430]  drm_fbdev_client_hotplug+0x173/0x210 [drm_kms_helper]
[    2.564438]  drm_fbdev_generic_setup+0xa5/0x166 [drm_kms_helper]
[    2.564446]  amdgpu_pci_probe+0x35e/0x370 [amdgpu]
[    2.564621]  local_pci_probe+0x45/0x80
[    2.564625]  ? pci_match_device+0xd7/0x130
[    2.564627]  pci_device_probe+0xbf/0x220
[    2.564629]  ? sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x69/0xd0
[    2.564633]  really_probe+0x19c/0x380
[    2.564637]  __driver_probe_device+0xfe/0x180
[    2.564639]  driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90
[    2.564641]  __driver_attach+0xc0/0x1c0
[    2.564643]  ? __device_attach_driver+0xe0/0xe0
[    2.564644]  ? __device_attach_driver+0xe0/0xe0
[    2.564646]  bus_for_each_dev+0x78/0xc0
[    2.564648]  bus_add_driver+0x149/0x1e0
[    2.564650]  driver_register+0x8f/0xe0
[    2.564652]  ? 0xffffffffc1023000
[    2.564654]  do_one_initcall+0x44/0x200
[    2.564657]  ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x177/0x2c0
[    2.564659]  do_init_module+0x4c/0x250
[    2.564663]  __do_sys_init_module+0x12e/0x1b0
[    2.564666]  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
[    2.564670]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[    2.564673] RIP: 0033:0x7fc69bff232e
[    2.564674] Code: 48 8b 0d 45 0b 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 49 89 ca b8 af 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 12 0b 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[    2.564676] RSP: 002b:00007ffe872ba3e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000af
[    2.564677] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055873f797820 RCX: 00007fc69bff232e
[    2.564678] RDX: 000055873f7bf390 RSI: 0000000001155e81 RDI: 00007fc699e4d010
[    2.564679] RBP: 00007fc699e4d010 R08: 000055873f7bfe20 R09: 0000000001155e90
[    2.564680] R10: 000000055873f7bf R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055873f7bf390
[    2.564681] R13: 000000000000000d R14: 000055873f7c4cb0 R15: 000055873f797820
[    2.564683]  </TASK>
[    2.564683] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---
[    2.564696] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[    2.564696] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 325 at drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_object.c:242 drm_object_attach_property+0x52/0x80 [drm]
[    2.564717] Modules linked in: btusb btrtl btbcm btintel btmtk bluetooth rfkill ecdh_generic ecc usbhid crc16 amdgpu(+) drm_ttm_helper ttm agpgart gpu_sched i2c_algo_bit drm_display_helper drm_kms_helper syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops drm serio_raw sdhci_pci atkbd libps2 cqhci vivaldi_fmap ccp sdhci i8042 crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul hid_multitouch ghash_clmulni_intel aesni_intel crypto_simd cryptd wdat_wdt mmc_core cec xhci_pci sp5100_tco rng_core xhci_pci_renesas serio 8250_dw i2c_hid_acpi i2c_hid btrfs blake2b_generic libcrc32c crc32c_generic crc32c_intel xor raid6_pq dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_mod pkcs8_key_parser crypto_user
[    2.564738] CPU: 6 PID: 325 Comm: systemd-udevd Tainted: G        W         5.18.0-amd-staging-drm-next+ #67
[    2.564740] Hardware name: Valve Jupiter/Jupiter, BIOS F7A0105 03/21/2022
[    2.564741] RIP: 0010:drm_object_attach_property+0x52/0x80 [drm]
[    2.564759] Code: 2d 83 f8 18 74 33 48 89 74 c1 08 48 8b 4f 08 48 89 94 c1 c8 00 00 00 48 8b 47 08 83 00 01 c3 4d 85 d2 75 dd 83 7f 58 01 75 d7 <0f> 0b eb d3 41 80 78 50 00 74 cc 0f 0b eb c8 44 89 ce 48 c7 c7 28
[    2.564760] RSP: 0018:ffffb2e8804138d8 EFLAGS: 00010246
[    2.564761] RAX: 0000000000000010 RBX: ffff99508c1a2000 RCX: ffff99508c1a2180
[    2.564762] RDX: 0000000000000003 RSI: ffff99508c050100 RDI: ffff99508c1a2040
[    2.564763] RBP: 00000000ffffffff R08: ffff99508a860010 R09: 00000000c0c0c0c0
[    2.564763] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000020 R12: ffff99508a860010
[    2.564764] R13: ffff995088733008 R14: ffff99508c1a2000 R15: ffffffffc068a47f
[    2.564765] FS:  00007fc69b5f1a40(0000) GS:ffff9953aff80000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[    2.564766] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[    2.564767] CR2: 00007f9506804000 CR3: 0000000107f92000 CR4: 0000000000350ee0
[    2.564768] Call Trace:
[    2.564769]  <TASK>
[    2.564770]  drm_connector_set_panel_orientation_with_quirk+0x4a/0xc0 [drm]
[    2.564789]  get_modes+0x4fb/0x530 [amdgpu]
[    2.565024]  drm_helper_probe_single_connector_modes+0x1ad/0x850 [drm_kms_helper]
[    2.565036]  drm_client_modeset_probe+0x229/0x1400 [drm]
[    2.565056]  ? xas_store+0x52/0x5e0
[    2.565060]  ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x177/0x2c0
[    2.565062]  __drm_fb_helper_initial_config_and_unlock+0x44/0x4e0 [drm_kms_helper]
[    2.565072]  drm_fbdev_client_hotplug+0x173/0x210 [drm_kms_helper]
[    2.565080]  drm_fbdev_generic_setup+0xa5/0x166 [drm_kms_helper]
[    2.565088]  amdgpu_pci_probe+0x35e/0x370 [amdgpu]
[    2.565261]  local_pci_probe+0x45/0x80
[    2.565263]  ? pci_match_device+0xd7/0x130
[    2.565265]  pci_device_probe+0xbf/0x220
[    2.565267]  ? sysfs_do_create_link_sd+0x69/0xd0
[    2.565268]  really_probe+0x19c/0x380
[    2.565270]  __driver_probe_device+0xfe/0x180
[    2.565272]  driver_probe_device+0x1e/0x90
[    2.565274]  __driver_attach+0xc0/0x1c0
[    2.565276]  ? __device_attach_driver+0xe0/0xe0
[    2.565278]  ? __device_attach_driver+0xe0/0xe0
[    2.565279]  bus_for_each_dev+0x78/0xc0
[    2.565281]  bus_add_driver+0x149/0x1e0
[    2.565283]  driver_register+0x8f/0xe0
[    2.565285]  ? 0xffffffffc1023000
[    2.565286]  do_one_initcall+0x44/0x200
[    2.565288]  ? kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x177/0x2c0
[    2.565290]  do_init_module+0x4c/0x250
[    2.565291]  __do_sys_init_module+0x12e/0x1b0
[    2.565294]  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
[    2.565296]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[    2.565297] RIP: 0033:0x7fc69bff232e
[    2.565298] Code: 48 8b 0d 45 0b 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48 83 c8 ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 90 f3 0f 1e fa 49 89 ca b8 af 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 8b 0d 12 0b 0c 00 f7 d8 64 89 01 48
[    2.565299] RSP: 002b:00007ffe872ba3e8 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000af
[    2.565301] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000055873f797820 RCX: 00007fc69bff232e
[    2.565302] RDX: 000055873f7bf390 RSI: 0000000001155e81 RDI: 00007fc699e4d010
[    2.565303] RBP: 00007fc699e4d010 R08: 000055873f7bfe20 R09: 0000000001155e90
[    2.565303] R10: 000000055873f7bf R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000055873f7bf390
[    2.565304] R13: 000000000000000d R14: 000055873f7c4cb0 R15: 000055873f797820
[    2.565306]  </TASK>
[    2.565307] ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

--

v2:
- call amdgpu_dm_connector_get_modes() instead of ddc_get_modes() (Harry)

Fixes: d77de78 ("amd/display: enable panel orientation quirks")
Acked-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Melissa Wen <mwen@igalia.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 6, 2023
@sean-jc @bonzini
KVM: x86/mmu: Don't attempt to map leaf if target TDP MMU SPTE is frozen
f5d16bb 
Hoist the is_removed_spte() check above the "level == goal_level" check
when walking SPTEs during a TDP MMU page fault to avoid attempting to map
a leaf entry if said entry is frozen by a different task/vCPU.

  ------------[ cut here ]------------
  WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 939 at arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c:653 kvm_tdp_mmu_map+0x269/0x4b0
  Modules linked in: kvm_intel
  CPU: 3 PID: 939 Comm: nx_huge_pages_t Not tainted 6.1.0-rc4+ #67
  Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 0.0.0 02/06/2015
  RIP: 0010:kvm_tdp_mmu_map+0x269/0x4b0
  RSP: 0018:ffffc9000068fba8 EFLAGS: 00010246
  RAX: 00000000000005a0 RBX: ffffc9000068fcc0 RCX: 0000000000000005
  RDX: ffff88810741f000 RSI: ffff888107f04600 RDI: ffffc900006a3000
  RBP: 060000010b000bf3 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
  R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 000ffffffffff000 R12: 0000000000000005
  R13: ffff888113670000 R14: ffff888107464958 R15: 0000000000000000
  FS:  00007f01c942c740(0000) GS:ffff888277cc0000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
  CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
  CR2: 0000000000000000 CR3: 0000000117013006 CR4: 0000000000172ea0
  Call Trace:
   <TASK>
   kvm_tdp_page_fault+0x10c/0x130
   kvm_mmu_page_fault+0x103/0x680
   vmx_handle_exit+0x132/0x5a0 [kvm_intel]
   vcpu_enter_guest+0x60c/0x16f0
   kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_run+0x1e2/0x9d0
   kvm_vcpu_ioctl+0x271/0x660
   __x64_sys_ioctl+0x80/0xb0
   do_syscall_64+0x2b/0x50
   entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0xb0
   </TASK>
  ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]---

Fixes: 63d28a2 ("KVM: x86/mmu: simplify kvm_tdp_mmu_map flow when guest has to retry")
Cc: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Robert Hoo <robert.hu@linux.intel.com>
Message-Id: <20221213033030.83345-2-seanjc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 28, 2023
@kuba-moo
net: bpf: Use sockopt_lock_sock() in ip_sock_set_tos()
0649776 
With latest sync from net-next tree, bpf-next has a bpf selftest failure:
  [root@arch-fb-vm1 bpf]# ./test_progs -t setget_sockopt
  ...
  [   76.194349] ============================================
  [   76.194682] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
  [   76.195039] 6.6.0-rc7-g37884503df08-dirty #67 Tainted: G        W  OE
  [   76.195518] --------------------------------------------
  [   76.195852] new_name/154 is trying to acquire lock:
  [   76.196159] ffff8c3e06ad8d30 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: ip_sock_set_tos+0x19/0x30
  [   76.196669]
  [   76.196669] but task is already holding lock:
  [   76.197028] ffff8c3e06ad8d30 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: inet_listen+0x21/0x70
  [   76.197517]
  [   76.197517] other info that might help us debug this:
  [   76.197919]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
  [   76.197919]
  [   76.198287]        CPU0
  [   76.198444]        ----
  [   76.198600]   lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
  [   76.198831]   lock(sk_lock-AF_INET);
  [   76.199062]
  [   76.199062]  *** DEADLOCK ***
  [   76.199062]
  [   76.199420]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
  [   76.199420]
  [   76.199879] 2 locks held by new_name/154:
  [   76.200131]  #0: ffff8c3e06ad8d30 (sk_lock-AF_INET){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: inet_listen+0x21/0x70
  [   76.200644]  #1: ffffffff90f96a40 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:2}, at: __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_ops+0x55/0x290
  [   76.201268]
  [   76.201268] stack backtrace:
  [   76.201538] CPU: 4 PID: 154 Comm: new_name Tainted: G        W  OE      6.6.0-rc7-g37884503df08-dirty #67
  [   76.202134] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.13.0-1ubuntu1.1 04/01/2014
  [   76.202699] Call Trace:
  [   76.202858]  <TASK>
  [   76.203002]  dump_stack_lvl+0x4b/0x80
  [   76.203239]  __lock_acquire+0x740/0x1ec0
  [   76.203503]  lock_acquire+0xc1/0x2a0
  [   76.203766]  ? ip_sock_set_tos+0x19/0x30
  [   76.204050]  ? sk_stream_write_space+0x12a/0x230
  [   76.204389]  ? lock_release+0xbe/0x260
  [   76.204661]  lock_sock_nested+0x32/0x80
  [   76.204942]  ? ip_sock_set_tos+0x19/0x30
  [   76.205208]  ip_sock_set_tos+0x19/0x30
  [   76.205452]  do_ip_setsockopt+0x4b3/0x1580
  [   76.205719]  __bpf_setsockopt+0x62/0xa0
  [   76.205963]  bpf_sock_ops_setsockopt+0x11/0x20
  [   76.206247]  bpf_prog_630217292049c96e_bpf_test_sockopt_int+0xbc/0x123
  [   76.206660]  bpf_prog_493685a3bae00bbd_bpf_test_ip_sockopt+0x49/0x4b
  [   76.207055]  bpf_prog_b0bcd27f269aeea0_skops_sockopt+0x44c/0xec7
  [   76.207437]  __cgroup_bpf_run_filter_sock_ops+0xda/0x290
  [   76.207829]  __inet_listen_sk+0x108/0x1b0
  [   76.208122]  inet_listen+0x48/0x70
  [   76.208373]  __sys_listen+0x74/0xb0
  [   76.208630]  __x64_sys_listen+0x16/0x20
  [   76.208911]  do_syscall_64+0x3f/0x90
  [   76.209174]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x6e/0xd8
  ...

Both ip_sock_set_tos() and inet_listen() calls lock_sock(sk) which
caused a dead lock.

To fix the issue, use sockopt_lock_sock() in ip_sock_set_tos()
instead. sockopt_lock_sock() will avoid lock_sock() if it is in bpf
context.

Fixes: 878d951 ("inet: lock the socket in ip_sock_set_tos()")
Suggested-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@linux.dev>
Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231027182424.1444845-1-yonghong.song@linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 15, 2024
@kuba-moo
net: defer final 'struct net' free in netns dismantle
0f6ede9 
Ilya reported a slab-use-after-free in dst_destroy [1]

Issue is in xfrm6_net_init() and xfrm4_net_init() :

They copy xfrm[46]_dst_ops_template into net->xfrm.xfrm[46]_dst_ops.

But net structure might be freed before all the dst callbacks are
called. So when dst_destroy() calls later :

if (dst->ops->destroy)
    dst->ops->destroy(dst);

dst->ops points to the old net->xfrm.xfrm[46]_dst_ops, which has been freed.

See a relevant issue fixed in :

ac888d5 ("net: do not delay dst_entries_add() in dst_release()")

A fix is to queue the 'struct net' to be freed after one
another cleanup_net() round (and existing rcu_barrier())

[1]

BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in dst_destroy (net/core/dst.c:112)
Read of size 8 at addr ffff8882137ccab0 by task swapper/37/0
Dec 03 05:46:18 kernel:
CPU: 37 UID: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/37 Kdump: loaded Not tainted 6.12.0 #67
Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL, BIOS 1.16.1-1.el9 04/01/2014
Call Trace:
 <IRQ>
dump_stack_lvl (lib/dump_stack.c:124)
print_address_description.constprop.0 (mm/kasan/report.c:378)
? dst_destroy (net/core/dst.c:112)
print_report (mm/kasan/report.c:489)
? dst_destroy (net/core/dst.c:112)
? kasan_addr_to_slab (mm/kasan/common.c:37)
kasan_report (mm/kasan/report.c:603)
? dst_destroy (net/core/dst.c:112)
? rcu_do_batch (kernel/rcu/tree.c:2567)
dst_destroy (net/core/dst.c:112)
rcu_do_batch (kernel/rcu/tree.c:2567)
? __pfx_rcu_do_batch (kernel/rcu/tree.c:2491)
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4339 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4406)
rcu_core (kernel/rcu/tree.c:2825)
handle_softirqs (kernel/softirq.c:554)
__irq_exit_rcu (kernel/softirq.c:589 kernel/softirq.c:428 kernel/softirq.c:637)
irq_exit_rcu (kernel/softirq.c:651)
sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt (arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1049)
 </IRQ>
 <TASK>
asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt (./arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:702)
RIP: 0010:default_idle (./arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:37 ./arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:92 arch/x86/kernel/process.c:743)
Code: 00 4d 29 c8 4c 01 c7 4c 29 c2 e9 6e ff ff ff 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 66 90 0f 00 2d c7 c9 27 00 fb f4 <fa> c3 cc cc cc cc 66 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 0f 1f 40 00 90
RSP: 0018:ffff888100d2fe00 EFLAGS: 00000246
RAX: 00000000001870ed RBX: 1ffff110201a5fc2 RCX: ffffffffb61a3e46
RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: ffffffffb3d4d123
RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: ffffed11c7e1835d
R10: ffff888e3f0c1aeb R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
R13: ffff888100d20000 R14: dffffc0000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
? ct_kernel_exit.constprop.0 (kernel/context_tracking.c:148)
? cpuidle_idle_call (kernel/sched/idle.c:186)
default_idle_call (./include/linux/cpuidle.h:143 kernel/sched/idle.c:118)
cpuidle_idle_call (kernel/sched/idle.c:186)
? __pfx_cpuidle_idle_call (kernel/sched/idle.c:168)
? lock_release (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:467 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5848)
? lockdep_hardirqs_on_prepare (kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4347 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4406)
? tsc_verify_tsc_adjust (arch/x86/kernel/tsc_sync.c:59)
do_idle (kernel/sched/idle.c:326)
cpu_startup_entry (kernel/sched/idle.c:423 (discriminator 1))
start_secondary (arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:202 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:282)
? __pfx_start_secondary (arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:232)
? soft_restart_cpu (arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S:452)
common_startup_64 (arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S:414)
 </TASK>
Dec 03 05:46:18 kernel:
Allocated by task 12184:
kasan_save_stack (mm/kasan/common.c:48)
kasan_save_track (./arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:49 mm/kasan/common.c:60 mm/kasan/common.c:69)
__kasan_slab_alloc (mm/kasan/common.c:319 mm/kasan/common.c:345)
kmem_cache_alloc_noprof (mm/slub.c:4085 mm/slub.c:4134 mm/slub.c:4141)
copy_net_ns (net/core/net_namespace.c:421 net/core/net_namespace.c:480)
create_new_namespaces (kernel/nsproxy.c:110)
unshare_nsproxy_namespaces (kernel/nsproxy.c:228 (discriminator 4))
ksys_unshare (kernel/fork.c:3313)
__x64_sys_unshare (kernel/fork.c:3382)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
Dec 03 05:46:18 kernel:
Freed by task 11:
kasan_save_stack (mm/kasan/common.c:48)
kasan_save_track (./arch/x86/include/asm/current.h:49 mm/kasan/common.c:60 mm/kasan/common.c:69)
kasan_save_free_info (mm/kasan/generic.c:582)
__kasan_slab_free (mm/kasan/common.c:271)
kmem_cache_free (mm/slub.c:4579 mm/slub.c:4681)
cleanup_net (net/core/net_namespace.c:456 net/core/net_namespace.c:446 net/core/net_namespace.c:647)
process_one_work (kernel/workqueue.c:3229)
worker_thread (kernel/workqueue.c:3304 kernel/workqueue.c:3391)
kthread (kernel/kthread.c:389)
ret_from_fork (arch/x86/kernel/process.c:147)
ret_from_fork_asm (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:257)
Dec 03 05:46:18 kernel:
Last potentially related work creation:
kasan_save_stack (mm/kasan/common.c:48)
__kasan_record_aux_stack (mm/kasan/generic.c:541)
insert_work (./include/linux/instrumented.h:68 ./include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 kernel/workqueue.c:788 kernel/workqueue.c:795 kernel/workqueue.c:2186)
__queue_work (kernel/workqueue.c:2340)
queue_work_on (kernel/workqueue.c:2391)
xfrm_policy_insert (net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c:1610)
xfrm_add_policy (net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:2116)
xfrm_user_rcv_msg (net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3321)
netlink_rcv_skb (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2536)
xfrm_netlink_rcv (net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3344)
netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1316 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1342)
netlink_sendmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1886)
sock_write_iter (net/socket.c:729 net/socket.c:744 net/socket.c:1165)
vfs_write (fs/read_write.c:590 fs/read_write.c:683)
ksys_write (fs/read_write.c:736)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)
Dec 03 05:46:18 kernel:
Second to last potentially related work creation:
kasan_save_stack (mm/kasan/common.c:48)
__kasan_record_aux_stack (mm/kasan/generic.c:541)
insert_work (./include/linux/instrumented.h:68 ./include/asm-generic/bitops/instrumented-non-atomic.h:141 kernel/workqueue.c:788 kernel/workqueue.c:795 kernel/workqueue.c:2186)
__queue_work (kernel/workqueue.c:2340)
queue_work_on (kernel/workqueue.c:2391)
__xfrm_state_insert (./include/linux/workqueue.h:723 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:1150 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:1145 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:1513)
xfrm_state_update (./include/linux/spinlock.h:396 net/xfrm/xfrm_state.c:1940)
xfrm_add_sa (net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:912)
xfrm_user_rcv_msg (net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3321)
netlink_rcv_skb (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2536)
xfrm_netlink_rcv (net/xfrm/xfrm_user.c:3344)
netlink_unicast (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1316 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1342)
netlink_sendmsg (net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1886)
sock_write_iter (net/socket.c:729 net/socket.c:744 net/socket.c:1165)
vfs_write (fs/read_write.c:590 fs/read_write.c:683)
ksys_write (fs/read_write.c:736)
do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83)
entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:130)

Fixes: a8a572a ("xfrm: dst_entries_init() per-net dst_ops")
Reported-by: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CANn89iKKYDVpB=MtmfH7nyv2p=rJWSLedO5k7wSZgtY_tO8WQg@mail.gmail.com/T/#m02c98c3009fe66382b73cfb4db9cf1df6fab3fbf
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20241204125455.3871859-1-edumazet@google.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf-rc bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 21, 2024
@peilin-ye
selftests/bpf: Add selftests for load-acquire and store-release instr…
ab3e6a2 
…uctions

Add the following ./test_progs tests:

  * atomics/load_acquire
  * atomics/store_release
  * arena_atomics/load_acquire
  * arena_atomics/store_release

They depend on the pre-defined __BPF_FEATURE_LOAD_ACQ_STORE_REL feature
macro, which implies -mcpu>=v4.

  $ ALLOWLIST=atomics/load_acquire,atomics/store_release,
  $ ALLOWLIST+=arena_atomics/load_acquire,arena_atomics/store_release

  $ ./test_progs-cpuv4 -a $ALLOWLIST

  #3/9     arena_atomics/load_acquire:OK
  #3/10    arena_atomics/store_release:OK
...
  #10/8    atomics/load_acquire:OK
  #10/9    atomics/store_release:OK

  $ ./test_progs -v -a $ALLOWLIST

  test_load_acquire:SKIP:Clang does not support BPF load-acquire or addr_space_cast
  #3/9     arena_atomics/load_acquire:SKIP
  test_store_release:SKIP:Clang does not support BPF store-release or addr_space_cast
  #3/10    arena_atomics/store_release:SKIP
...
  test_load_acquire:SKIP:Clang does not support BPF load-acquire
  #10/8    atomics/load_acquire:SKIP
  test_store_release:SKIP:Clang does not support BPF store-release
  #10/9    atomics/store_release:SKIP

Additionally, add several ./test_verifier tests:

  #65/u atomic BPF_LOAD_ACQ access through non-pointer  OK
  #65/p atomic BPF_LOAD_ACQ access through non-pointer  OK
  #66/u atomic BPF_STORE_REL access through non-pointer  OK
  #66/p atomic BPF_STORE_REL access through non-pointer  OK

  #67/u BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 8-bit OK
  #67/p BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 8-bit OK
  #68/u BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 16-bit OK
  #68/p BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 16-bit OK
  #69/u BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 32-bit OK
  #69/p BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 32-bit OK
  #70/u BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 64-bit OK
  #70/p BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 64-bit OK
  #71/u Cannot load-acquire from uninitialized src_reg OK
  #71/p Cannot load-acquire from uninitialized src_reg OK

  #76/u BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 8-bit OK
  #76/p BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 8-bit OK
  #77/u BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 16-bit OK
  #77/p BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 16-bit OK
  #78/u BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 32-bit OK
  #78/p BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 32-bit OK
  #79/u BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 64-bit OK
  #79/p BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 64-bit OK
  #80/u Cannot store-release from uninitialized src_reg OK
  #80/p Cannot store-release from uninitialized src_reg OK

Reviewed-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
accepted bpf-next V1
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@kernel-patches-bot