Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

xsk: i40e: Tx performance improvements #320

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

kernel-patches-bot
Copy link

Pull request for series with
subject: xsk: i40e: Tx performance improvements
version: 2
url: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=381107

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: f52b8fd
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=381107
version: 2

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 0e6f601
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=381107
version: 2

Increment the statistics over how many Tx packets have been sent at
the time of sending instead of at the time of completion. This as a
completion event means that the buffer has been sent AND returned to
user space. The packet always gets sent shortly after sendto() is
called. The kernel might, for performance reasons, decide to not
return every single buffer to user space immediately after sending,
for example, only after a batch of packets have been
transmitted. Incrementing the number of packets sent at completion,
will in that case be confusing as if you send a single packet, the
counter might show zero for a while even though the packet has been
transmitted.

Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Remove the unnecessary access to the software ring for the AF_XDP
zero-copy driver. This was used to record the length of the packet so
that the driver Tx completion code could sum this up to produce the
total bytes sent. This is now performed during the transmission of the
packet, so no need to record this in the software ring.

Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Introduce one cache line worth of padding between the consumer pointer
and the flags field as well as between the flags field and the start
of the descriptors in all the lockless rings. This so that the x86 HW
adjacency prefetcher will not prefetch the adjacent pointer/field when
only one pointer/field is going to be used. This improves throughput
performance for the l2fwd sample app with 1% on my machine with HW
prefetching turned on in the BIOS.

Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Introduce batched descriptor interfaces in the xsk core code for the
Tx path to be used in the driver to write a code path with higher
performance. This interface will be used by the i40e driver in the
next patch. Though other drivers would likely benefit from this new
interface too.

Note that batching is only implemented for the common case when
there is only one socket bound to the same device and queue id. When
this is not the case, we fall back to the old non-batched version of
the function.

Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Use the new batched xsk interfaces for the Tx path in the i40e driver
to improve performance. On my machine, this yields a throughput
increase of 4% for the l2fwd sample app in xdpsock. If we instead just
look at the Tx part, this patch set increases throughput with above
20% for Tx.

Note that I had to explicitly loop unroll the inner loop to get to
this performance level, by using a pragma. It is honored by both clang
and gcc and should be ignored by versions that do not support
it. Using the -funroll-loops compiler command line switch on the
source file resulted in a loop unrolling on a higher level that
lead to a performance decrease instead of an increase.

Signed-off-by: Magnus Karlsson <magnus.karlsson@intel.com>
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

Master branch: 9600d62
series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=381107
version: 2

@kernel-patches-bot
Copy link
Author

At least one diff in series https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/netdevbpf/list/?series=381107 expired. Closing PR.

@kernel-patches-bot kernel-patches-bot deleted the series/381107=>bpf-next branch November 14, 2020 07:48
kernel-patches-bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 28, 2021
…format

For incoming SCO connection with transparent coding format, alt setting
of CVSD is getting applied instead of Transparent.

Before fix:
< HCI Command: Accept Synchron.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21  #2196 [hci0] 321.342548
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Transmit bandwidth: 8000
        Receive bandwidth: 8000
        Max latency: 13
        Setting: 0x0003
          Input Coding: Linear
          Input Data Format: 1's complement
          Input Sample Size: 8-bit
          # of bits padding at MSB: 0
          Air Coding Format: Transparent Data
        Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02)
        Packet type: 0x003f
          HV1 may be used
          HV2 may be used
          HV3 may be used
          EV3 may be used
          EV4 may be used
          EV5 may be used
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4               #2197 [hci0] 321.343585
      Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Comp.. (0x2c) plen 17  #2198 [hci0] 321.351666
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Handle: 257
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Link type: eSCO (0x02)
        Transmission interval: 0x0c
        Retransmission window: 0x04
        RX packet length: 60
        TX packet length: 60
        Air mode: Transparent (0x03)
........
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2336 [hci0] 321.383655
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2337 [hci0] 321.389558
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2338 [hci0] 321.393615
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2339 [hci0] 321.393618
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2340 [hci0] 321.393618
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2341 [hci0] 321.397070
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2342 [hci0] 321.403622
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2343 [hci0] 321.403625
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2344 [hci0] 321.403625
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2345 [hci0] 321.403625
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2346 [hci0] 321.404569
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2347 [hci0] 321.412091
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2348 [hci0] 321.413626
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2349 [hci0] 321.413630
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 48            #2350 [hci0] 321.413630
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60            #2351 [hci0] 321.419674

After fix:

< HCI Command: Accept Synchronou.. (0x01|0x0029) plen 21  #309 [hci0] 49.439693
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Transmit bandwidth: 8000
        Receive bandwidth: 8000
        Max latency: 13
        Setting: 0x0003
          Input Coding: Linear
          Input Data Format: 1's complement
          Input Sample Size: 8-bit
          # of bits padding at MSB: 0
          Air Coding Format: Transparent Data
        Retransmission effort: Optimize for link quality (0x02)
        Packet type: 0x003f
          HV1 may be used
          HV2 may be used
          HV3 may be used
          EV3 may be used
          EV4 may be used
          EV5 may be used
> HCI Event: Command Status (0x0f) plen 4                 #310 [hci0] 49.440308
      Accept Synchronous Connection Request (0x01|0x0029) ncmd 1
        Status: Success (0x00)
> HCI Event: Synchronous Connect Complete (0x2c) plen 17  #311 [hci0] 49.449308
        Status: Success (0x00)
        Handle: 257
        Address: 1C:CC:D6:E2:EA:80 (Xiaomi Communications Co Ltd)
        Link type: eSCO (0x02)
        Transmission interval: 0x0c
        Retransmission window: 0x04
        RX packet length: 60
        TX packet length: 60
        Air mode: Transparent (0x03)
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #312 [hci0] 49.450421
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #313 [hci0] 49.457927
> HCI Event: Max Slots Change (0x1b) plen 3               #314 [hci0] 49.460345
        Handle: 256
        Max slots: 5
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #315 [hci0] 49.465453
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #316 [hci0] 49.470502
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #317 [hci0] 49.470519
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #318 [hci0] 49.472996
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #319 [hci0] 49.480412
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #320 [hci0] 49.480492
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #321 [hci0] 49.487989
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #322 [hci0] 49.490303
< SCO Data TX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #323 [hci0] 49.495496
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #324 [hci0] 49.500304
> SCO Data RX: Handle 257 flags 0x00 dlen 60              #325 [hci0] 49.500311

Signed-off-by: Kiran K <kiran.k@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Lokendra Singh <lokendra.singh@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2024
Recent additions in BPF like cpu v4 instructions, test_bpf module
exhibits the following failures:

	test_bpf: #82 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #83 ALU_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #84 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_B jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #85 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_H jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #86 ALU64_MOVSX | BPF_W jited:1 ret 2 != 1 (0x2 != 0x1)FAIL (1 times)

	test_bpf: #165 ALU_SDIV_X: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #166 ALU_SDIV_K: -6 / 2 = -3 jited:1 ret 2147483645 != -3 (0x7ffffffd != 0xfffffffd)FAIL (1 times)

	test_bpf: #169 ALU_SMOD_X: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)
	test_bpf: #170 ALU_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

	test_bpf: #172 ALU64_SMOD_K: -7 % 2 = -1 jited:1 ret 1 != -1 (0x1 != 0xffffffff)FAIL (1 times)

	test_bpf: #313 BSWAP 16: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcd
	eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
	jited:0 301 PASS
	test_bpf: #314 BSWAP 32: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0xefcdab89
	eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
	jited:0 555 PASS
	test_bpf: #315 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef -> 0x67452301
	eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
	jited:0 268 PASS
	test_bpf: #316 BSWAP 64: 0x0123456789abcdef >> 32 -> 0xefcdab89
	eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
	jited:0 269 PASS
	test_bpf: #317 BSWAP 16: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x1032
	eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
	jited:0 460 PASS
	test_bpf: #318 BSWAP 32: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x10325476
	eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
	jited:0 320 PASS
	test_bpf: #319 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 -> 0x98badcfe
	eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
	jited:0 222 PASS
	test_bpf: #320 BSWAP 64: 0xfedcba9876543210 >> 32 -> 0x10325476
	eBPF filter opcode 00d7 (@2) unsupported
	jited:0 273 PASS

	test_bpf: #344 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_B
	eBPF filter opcode 0091 (@5) unsupported
	jited:0 432 PASS
	test_bpf: #345 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_H
	eBPF filter opcode 0089 (@5) unsupported
	jited:0 381 PASS
	test_bpf: #346 BPF_LDX_MEMSX | BPF_W
	eBPF filter opcode 0081 (@5) unsupported
	jited:0 505 PASS

	test_bpf: #490 JMP32_JA: Unconditional jump: if (true) return 1
	eBPF filter opcode 0006 (@1) unsupported
	jited:0 261 PASS

	test_bpf: Summary: 1040 PASSED, 10 FAILED, [924/1038 JIT'ed]

Fix them by adding missing processing.

Fixes: daabb2b ("bpf/tests: add tests for cpuv4 instructions")
Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants