selftests/bpf: Fix endianness issue in test_sockopt_sk #70
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Master branch: c64779e patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200915113928.3768496-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/ applied successfully |
|
Master branch: c64779e patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200915113928.3768496-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/ applied successfully |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/201954=>bpf-next
branch
from
0c3d65e to
9f3d658
Compare
|
Master branch: c64779e patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200915113928.3768496-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/ applied successfully |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/201954=>bpf-next
branch
from
9f3d658 to
acd0a11
Compare
|
Master branch: c64779e patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200915113928.3768496-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/ applied successfully |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/201954=>bpf-next
branch
from
acd0a11 to
702c6fa
Compare
|
Master branch: c64779e patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200915113928.3768496-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/ applied successfully |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/201954=>bpf-next
branch
from
702c6fa to
c8c44ee
Compare
|
Master branch: c64779e patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200915113928.3768496-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/ applied successfully |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/201954=>bpf-next
branch
from
c8c44ee to
6e573b5
Compare
the resulting int. It is ok on little endian, but not on big endian. Fix by checking char instead. Fixes: 8a027dc ("selftests/bpf: add sockopt test that exercises sk helpers") Signed-off-by: Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com> --- v1->v2: Also pass a single byte to log_err. tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/sockopt_sk.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
|
Master branch: 3b03791 patch https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/patch/20200915113928.3768496-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/ applied successfully |
kernel-patches-bot
force-pushed
the
series/201954=>bpf-next
branch
from
6e573b5 to
fb7c9d7
Compare
|
At least one diff in series https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=201954 irrelevant now. Closing PR. |
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 5, 2021
Christoph Paasch reported following crash: dst_release underflow WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 1319 at net/core/dst.c:175 dst_release+0xc1/0xd0 net/core/dst.c:175 CPU: 0 PID: 1319 Comm: syz-executor217 Not tainted 5.11.0-rc6af8e85128b4d0d24083c5cac646e891227052e0c #70 Call Trace: rt_cache_route+0x12e/0x140 net/ipv4/route.c:1503 rt_set_nexthop.constprop.0+0x1fc/0x590 net/ipv4/route.c:1612 __mkroute_output net/ipv4/route.c:2484 [inline] ... The worker leaves msk->subflow alone even when it happened to close the subflow ssk associated with it. Fixes: 866f26f ("mptcp: always graft subflow socket to parent") Closes: multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next#157 Reported-by: Christoph Paasch <cpaasch@apple.com> Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Mat Martineau <mathew.j.martineau@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
kernel-patches-bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 9, 2022
The srv_mutex is used during writeback so cifs should ensure that allocations done when that mutex is held are done with GFP_NOFS, to avoid having direct reclaim ending up waiting for the same mutex and causing a deadlock. This is detected by lockdep with the splat below: ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 5.18.0 #70 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ kswapd0/49 is trying to acquire lock: ffff8880195782e0 (&tcp_ses->srv_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: compound_send_recv but task is already holding lock: ffffffffa98e66c0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #1 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}: fs_reclaim_acquire kmem_cache_alloc_trace __request_module crypto_alg_mod_lookup crypto_alloc_tfm_node crypto_alloc_shash cifs_alloc_hash smb311_crypto_shash_allocate smb311_update_preauth_hash compound_send_recv cifs_send_recv SMB2_negotiate smb2_negotiate cifs_negotiate_protocol cifs_get_smb_ses cifs_mount cifs_smb3_do_mount smb3_get_tree vfs_get_tree path_mount __x64_sys_mount do_syscall_64 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe -> #0 (&tcp_ses->srv_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}: __lock_acquire lock_acquire __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested compound_send_recv cifs_send_recv SMB2_write smb2_sync_write cifs_write cifs_writepage_locked cifs_writepage shrink_page_list shrink_lruvec shrink_node balance_pgdat kswapd kthread ret_from_fork other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&tcp_ses->srv_mutex); lock(fs_reclaim); lock(&tcp_ses->srv_mutex); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by kswapd0/49: #0: ffffffffa98e66c0 (fs_reclaim){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: balance_pgdat stack backtrace: CPU: 2 PID: 49 Comm: kswapd0 Not tainted 5.18.0 #70 Call Trace: <TASK> dump_stack_lvl dump_stack print_circular_bug.cold check_noncircular __lock_acquire lock_acquire __mutex_lock mutex_lock_nested compound_send_recv cifs_send_recv SMB2_write smb2_sync_write cifs_write cifs_writepage_locked cifs_writepage shrink_page_list shrink_lruvec shrink_node balance_pgdat kswapd kthread ret_from_fork </TASK> Fix this by using the memalloc_nofs_save/restore APIs around the places where the srv_mutex is held. Do this in a wrapper function for the lock/unlock of the srv_mutex, and rename the srv_mutex to avoid missing call sites in the conversion. Note that there is another lockdep warning involving internal crypto locks, which was masked by this problem and is visible after this fix, see the discussion in this thread: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220523123755.GA13668@axis.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/CANT5p=rqcYfYMVHirqvdnnca4Mo+JQSw5Qu12v=kPfpk5yhhmg@mail.gmail.com/ Reported-by: Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@gmail.com> Suggested-by: Lars Persson <larper@axis.com> Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Enzo Matsumiya <ematsumiya@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> Signed-off-by: Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2023
… when the system is sleeping Some channels may be masked. When the system is suspended, if these masked channels are not filtered out, this will lead to null pointer operations and system crash: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address Mem abort info: ESR = 0x0000000096000004 EC = 0x25: DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits SET = 0, FnV = 0 EA = 0, S1PTW = 0 FSC = 0x04: level 0 translation fault Data abort info: ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000004, ISS2 = 0x00000000 CM = 0, WnR = 0, TnD = 0, TagAccess = 0 GCS = 0, Overlay = 0, DirtyBit = 0, Xs = 0 user pgtable: 4k pages, 48-bit VAs, pgdp=0000000894300000 [00000000000002a0] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000 Internal error: Oops: 0000000096000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP Modules linked in: CPU: 1 PID: 989 Comm: sh Tainted: G B 6.6.0-16203-g557fb7a3ec4c-dirty #70 Hardware name: Freescale i.MX8QM MEK (DT) pstate: 400000c5 (nZcv daIF -PAN -UAO -TCO -DIT -SSBS BTYPE=--) pc: fsl_edma_disable_request+0x3c/0x78 lr: fsl_edma_disable_request+0x3c/0x78 sp:ffff800089ae7690 x29: ffff800089ae7690 x28: ffff000807ab5440 x27: ffff000807ab5830 x26: 0000000000000008 x25: 0000000000000278 x24: 0000000000000001 23: ffff000807ab4328 x22: 0000000000000000 x21: 0000000000000009 x20: ffff800082616940 x19: 0000000000000000 x18: 0000000000000000 x17: 3d3d3d3d3d3d3d3d x16: 3d3d3d3d3d3d3d3d x15: 3d3d3d3d3d3d3d3d x14: 3d3d3d3d3d3d3d3d x13: 3d3d3d3d3d3d3d3d x12: 1ffff00010d45724 x11: ffff700010d45724 x10: dfff800000000000 x9: dfff800000000000 x8: 00008fffef2ba8dc x7: 0000000000000001 x6: ffff800086a2b927 x5: ffff800086a2b920 x4: ffff700010d45725 x3: ffff8000800d5bbc x2 : 0000000000000000 x1 : ffff000800c1d880 x0 : 0000000000000001 Call trace: fsl_edma_disable_request+0x3c/0x78 fsl_edma_suspend_late+0x128/0x12c dpm_run_callback+0xd4/0x304 __device_suspend_late+0xd0/0x240 dpm_suspend_late+0x174/0x59c suspend_devices_and_enter+0x194/0xd00 pm_suspend+0x3c4/0x910 Fixes: 72f5801 ("dmaengine: fsl-edma: integrate v3 support") Signed-off-by: Xiaolei Wang <xiaolei.wang@windriver.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231113225713.1892643-2-xiaolei.wang@windriver.com Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
kernel-patches-daemon-bpf bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 21, 2024
…uctions Add the following ./test_progs tests: * atomics/load_acquire * atomics/store_release * arena_atomics/load_acquire * arena_atomics/store_release They depend on the pre-defined __BPF_FEATURE_LOAD_ACQ_STORE_REL feature macro, which implies -mcpu>=v4. $ ALLOWLIST=atomics/load_acquire,atomics/store_release, $ ALLOWLIST+=arena_atomics/load_acquire,arena_atomics/store_release $ ./test_progs-cpuv4 -a $ALLOWLIST #3/9 arena_atomics/load_acquire:OK #3/10 arena_atomics/store_release:OK ... #10/8 atomics/load_acquire:OK #10/9 atomics/store_release:OK $ ./test_progs -v -a $ALLOWLIST test_load_acquire:SKIP:Clang does not support BPF load-acquire or addr_space_cast #3/9 arena_atomics/load_acquire:SKIP test_store_release:SKIP:Clang does not support BPF store-release or addr_space_cast #3/10 arena_atomics/store_release:SKIP ... test_load_acquire:SKIP:Clang does not support BPF load-acquire #10/8 atomics/load_acquire:SKIP test_store_release:SKIP:Clang does not support BPF store-release #10/9 atomics/store_release:SKIP Additionally, add several ./test_verifier tests: #65/u atomic BPF_LOAD_ACQ access through non-pointer OK #65/p atomic BPF_LOAD_ACQ access through non-pointer OK #66/u atomic BPF_STORE_REL access through non-pointer OK #66/p atomic BPF_STORE_REL access through non-pointer OK #67/u BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 8-bit OK #67/p BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 8-bit OK #68/u BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 16-bit OK #68/p BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 16-bit OK #69/u BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 32-bit OK #69/p BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 32-bit OK #70/u BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 64-bit OK #70/p BPF_ATOMIC load-acquire, 64-bit OK #71/u Cannot load-acquire from uninitialized src_reg OK #71/p Cannot load-acquire from uninitialized src_reg OK #76/u BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 8-bit OK #76/p BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 8-bit OK #77/u BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 16-bit OK #77/p BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 16-bit OK #78/u BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 32-bit OK #78/p BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 32-bit OK #79/u BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 64-bit OK #79/p BPF_ATOMIC store-release, 64-bit OK #80/u Cannot store-release from uninitialized src_reg OK #80/p Cannot store-release from uninitialized src_reg OK Reviewed-by: Josh Don <joshdon@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peilin Ye <yepeilin@google.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pull request for series with
subject: selftests/bpf: Fix endianness issue in test_sockopt_sk
version: 2
url: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/netdev/list/?series=201954