Make breaking API changes without breaking things! Use request_migrations
to craft
backwards-compatible migrations for API requests, responses, and more. Read the blog
post.
This gem was extracted from Keygen and is being used in production to serve millions of API requests per day.
Sponsored by:
A fair source software licensing and distribution API.
Links:
- Installing request_migrations
- Supported Ruby versions
- RubyDoc
- Usage
- Testing
- Tips and tricks
- Examples
- Credits
- Contributing
- License
Add this line to your application's Gemfile
:
gem 'request_migrations'
And then execute:
$ bundle
Or install it yourself as:
$ gem install request_migrations
request_migrations
supports Ruby 3.1 and above. We encourage you to upgrade if you're on an older
version. Ruby 3 provides a lot of great features, like better pattern matching and a new shorthand
hash syntax.
You can find the documentation on RubyDoc.
We're working on improving the docs.
- Define migrations for migrating a response between versions.
- Define migrations for migrating a request between versions.
- Define migrations for applying data migrations.
- Define version-based routing constraints.
- It's fast.
Use request_migrations
to make backwards-incompatible changes in your code, while
providing a backwards-compatible interface for clients on older API versions. What
exactly does that mean? Well, let's demonstrate!
Let's assume that we provide an API service, which has /users
CRUD resources.
Let's also assume we start with the following User
model:
class User
include ActiveModel::Model
include ActiveModel::Attributes
attribute :name, :string
end
After awhile, we realize our User
model's combined name
attribute is not working too
well, and we want to change it to first_name
and last_name
.
So we write a database migration that changes our User
model:
class User
include ActiveModel::Model
include ActiveModel::Attributes
attribute :first_name, :string
attribute :last_name, :string
end
But what about the API consumers who were relying on name
? We just broke our API contract
with them! To resolve this, let's create our first request migration.
We recommend that migrations be stored under app/migrations/
.
class CombineNamesForUserMigration < RequestMigrations::Migration
# Provide a useful description of the change
description %(transforms a user's first and last name to a combined name attribute)
# Migrate inputs that contain a user. The migration should mutate
# the input, whatever that may be.
migrate if: -> data { data in type: 'user' } do |data|
first_name = data.delete(:first_name)
last_name = data.delete(:last_name)
data[:name] = "#{first_name} #{last_name}"
end
# Migrate the response. This is where you provide the migration input.
response if: -> res { res.successful? && res.request.params in controller: 'api/v1/users',
action: 'show' } do |res|
data = JSON.parse(res.body, symbolize_names: true)
# Call our migrate definition above
migrate!(data)
res.body = JSON.generate(data)
end
end
As you can see, with pattern matching, it makes creating migrations for certain
resources simple. Here, we've defined a migration that only runs for the users#show
resource, and only when the response is successful. In addition, the data is
only migrated when the response body contains a user.
Next, we'll need to configure request_migrations
via an initializer under
initializers/request_migrations.rb
:
RequestMigrations.configure do |config|
# Define a resolver to determine the target version. Here, you can perform
# a lookup on the current user using request parameters, or simply use
# a header like we are here, defaulting to the latest version.
config.request_version_resolver = -> request {
request.headers.fetch('Foo-Version') { config.current_version }
}
# Define the latest version of our application.
config.current_version = '1.1'
# Define previous versions and their migrations, in descending order.
config.versions = {
'1.0' => %i[combine_names_for_user_migration],
}
end
Lastly, you'll want to update your application controller so that migrations are applied:
class ApplicationController < ActionController::API
include RequestMigrations::Controller::Migrations
# Optionally rescue from requests for unsupported versions
rescue_from RequestMigrations::UnsupportedVersionError, with: -> {
render(
json: { error: 'unsupported API version requested', code: 'INVALID_API_VERSION' },
status: :bad_request,
)
}
end
Now, when an API client provides a Foo-Version: 1.0
header, they'll receive a
response containing the combined name
attribute.
We covered this above, but response migrations define a change to a response.
You define a response migration by using the response
class method.
class RemoveVowelsMigration < RequestMigrations::Migration
description %(in the past, we had a bug that removed all vowels, and some clients rely on that behavior)
response if: -> res { res.request.params in action: 'index' | 'show' | 'create' | 'update' } do |res|
body = JSON.parse(res.body, symbolize_names: true)
# Mutate the response body by removing all vowels
body.deep_transform_values! { _1.gsub(/[aeiou]/, '') }
res.body = JSON.generate(body)
end
end
The response
method accepts an :if
keyword, which should be a lambda
that evaluates to a boolean, which determines whether or not the migration
should be applied. An ActionDispatch::Response
will be yielded, the
current response (calls controller#response
).
The gem makes no assumption on a response's content type or what the migration will do. You could, for example, migrate the response body, or mutate the headers, or even change the response's status code.
The response
method can be used multiple times per-migration.
Request migrations define a change on a request. For example, modifying a request's
headers. You define a response migration by using the request
class method.
class AssumeContentTypeMigration < RequestMigrations::Migration
description %(in the past, we assumed all requests were JSON, but that has since changed)
# Migrate the request, adding an assumed content type to all requests.
request do |req|
req.headers['Content-Type'] = 'application/json'
end
end
The request
method accepts an :if
keyword, which should be a lambda
that evaluates to a boolean, which determines whether or not the migration
should be applied. An ActionDispatch::Request
object will be yielded,
the current request (calls controller#request
).
Again, like with response migrations, the gem makes no assumption on what a migration does. A migration could mutate a request's params, or mutate headers. It's up to you, all it does is provide the request.
Request migrations should avoid using the migrate
method.
The request
method can be used multiple times.
In our first scenario, where we combined our user's name attributes, we defined
our migration using the migrate
class method. At this point, you may be wondering
why we did that, since we didn't use that method for the 2 previous request and
response migrations above.
Well, it comes down to support for data migrations (as well as offering a nice
interface for pattern matching inputs). Let's go back to our first example,
CombineNamesForUserMigration
.
class CombineNamesForUserMigration < RequestMigrations::Migration
# Provide a useful description of the change
description %(transforms a user's first and last name to a combined name attribute)
# Migrate inputs that contain a user. The migration should mutate
# the input, whatever that may be.
migrate if: -> data { data in type: 'user' } do |data|
first_name = data.delete(:first_name)
last_name = data.delete(:last_name)
data[:name] = "#{first_name} #{last_name}"
end
# Migrate the response. This is where you provide the migration input.
response if: -> res { res.successful? && res.request.params in controller: 'api/v1/users' | 'api/v1/me',
action: 'show' } do |res|
data = JSON.parse(res.body, symbolize_names: true)
# Call our migrate definition above
migrate!(data)
res.body = JSON.generate(data)
end
end
What if we had a webhook system
that we also needed to apply these migrations to? Well, we can use a data migration
here, via the Migrator
class:
class WebhookWorker
def perform(event, endpoint, data)
# ...
# Migrate event data from latest version to endpoint's configured version
current_version = RequestMigrations.config.current_version
target_version = endpoint.api_version
migrator = RequestMigrations::Migrator.new(
from: current_version,
to: target_version,
)
# Migrate the event data (tries to apply all matching migrations)
migrator.migrate!(data:)
# ...
event.send!(data)
end
end
This will apply the block defined in migrate
onto our data. With that,
we've successfully applied a migration to both our API responses, as well
as to the webhook events we send. In this case, if our event data matches
our expected data shape, e.g. type: 'user'
, then the migration will
be applied.
In addition to data migrations, this allows for easier testing.
The migrate
method can be used multiple times per-migration to e.g.
match and migrate on different shapes of data. For a JSON:API app,
for example, you could migrate on data: [*]
and includes: [*]
.
When you want to encourage API clients to upgrade, you can utilize a routing version_constraint
to define routes only available for certain versions.
You can also utilize routing constraints to remove an API endpoint entirely.
Rails.application.routes.draw do
# This endpoint is only available for version 1.1 and above
version_constraint '>= 1.1' do
resources :some_shiny_new_resource
end
# Remove this endpoint for any version below 1.1
version_constraint '< 1.1' do
scope module: :v1x0 do
resources :a_deprecated_resource
end
end
end
Currently, routing constraints only work for the :semver
version format. (PRs welcome!)
RequestMigrations.configure do |config|
# Define a resolver to determine the target version. Here, you can perform
# a lookup on the current user using request parameters, or simply use
# a header like we are here, defaulting to the latest version.
config.request_version_resolver = -> request {
request.headers.fetch('Foo-Version') { config.current_version }
}
# Define the accepted version format. Default is :semver.
config.version_format = :semver
# Define the latest version of our application.
config.current_version = '1.2'
# Define previous versions and their migrations, in descending order.
# Should be a hash, where the key is the version and the value is an
# array of migration symbols or classes.
config.versions = {
'1.1' => %i[
has_one_author_to_has_many_for_posts_migration
has_one_author_to_has_many_for_post_migration
],
'1.0' => %i[
combine_names_for_users_migration
combine_names_for_user_migration
],
}
# Use a custom logger. Supports ActiveSupport::TaggedLogging.
config.logger = Rails.logger
end
By default, request_migrations
uses a :semver
version format, but it can be configured
to instead use one of the following, set via config.version_format=
.
Format | |
---|---|
:semver |
Use semantic versions, e.g. 1.0 , 1.1 , and 2.0 . |
:date |
Use date versions, e.g. 2020-09-02 , 2021-01-01 . |
:integer |
Use integer versions, e.g. 1 , 2 , and 3 . |
:float |
Use float versions, e.g. 1.0 , 1.1 , and 2.0 . |
:string |
Use string versions, e.g. a , b , and z . |
All versions will be sorted according to the format's type.
Using data migrations allows for easier testing of migrations. For example, using Rspec:
describe CombineNamesForUserMigration do
before do
RequestMigrations.configure do |config|
config.current_version = '1.1'
config.versions = {
'1.0' => [CombineNamesForUserMigration],
}
end
end
it 'should migrate user name attributes' do
migrator = RequestMigrations::Migrator.new(from: '1.1', to: '1.0')
data = serialize(
create(:user, first_name: 'John', last_name: 'Doe'),
)
expect(data).to include(type: 'user', first_name: 'John', last_name: 'Doe')
expect(data).to_not include(name: anything)
migrator.migrate!(data:)
expect(data).to include(type: 'user', name: 'John Doe')
expect(data).to_not include(first_name: 'John', last_name: 'Doe')
end
end
To avoid polluting the global configuration, you can use RequestMigrations::Testing
within your application's spec/rails_helper.rb
, or a similar spec helper:
require 'request_migrations/testing'
Rspec.configure do |config|
config.before :each do
RequestMigrations::Testing.setup!
end
config.after :each do
RequestMigrations::Testing.teardown!
end
end
This will setup a new test configuration, and then restore the previous global configuration after each spec.
Over the years, we're learned a thing or two about versioning an API. We'll share tips here.
Pattern matching really cleans up the :if
conditions, and overall makes migrations more readable.
class AddUsernameAttributeToUsersMigration < RequestMigrations::Migration
description %(adds username attributes to a collection of users)
migrate if: -> body { body in data: [*] } do |body|
case body
in data: [*, { type: 'users', attributes: { ** } }, *]
body[:data].each do |user|
case user
in type: 'users', attributes: { email: }
user[:attributes][:username] = email
else
end
end
else
end
end
response if: -> res { res.successful? && res.request.params in controller: 'api/v1/users',
action: 'index' } do |res|
body = JSON.parse(res.body, symbolize_names: true)
migrate!(body)
res.body = JSON.generate(body)
end
end
Just be sure to remember your else
block when case
pattern matching. :)
If you need to use route helpers in a migration, include them in your migration:
class SomeMigration < RequestMigrations::Migration
include Rails.application.routes.url_helpers
end
Define separate migrations for different input shapes, e.g. define a migration for an #index
to migrate an array of objects, and define another migration that handles the singular object
from #show
, #create
and #update
. This will help keep your migrations readable.
For example, for a singular user response:
class CombineNamesForUserMigration < RequestMigrations::Migration
description %(transforms a user's first and last name to a combined name attribute)
migrate if: -> data { data in type: 'user' } do |data|
first_name = data.delete(:first_name)
last_name = data.delete(:last_name)
data[:name] = "#{first_name} #{last_name}"
end
response if: -> res { res.successful? && res.request.params in controller: 'api/v1/users',
action: 'show' } do |res|
data = JSON.parse(res.body, symbolize_names: true)
migrate!(data)
res.body = JSON.generate(data)
end
end
And for a response containing a collection of users:
class CombineNamesForUsersMigration < RequestMigrations::Migration
description %(transforms a collection of users' first and last names to a combined name attribute)
migrate if: -> data { data in [*, { type: 'user' }, *] do |data|
data.each do |record|
case record
in type: 'user', first_name:, last_name:
record[:name] = "#{first_name} #{last_name}"
record.delete(:first_name)
record.delete(:last_name)
else
end
end
end
response if: -> res { res.successful? && res.request.params in controller: 'api/v1/users',
action: 'index' } do |res|
data = JSON.parse(res.body, symbolize_names: true)
migrate!(data)
res.body = JSON.generate(data)
end
end
Note that the migrate
method now migrates an array input, and matches on the #index
route.
Always check a response's status. You don't want to unintentionally apply migrations to error responses.
class SomeMigration < RequestMigrations::Migration
response if: -> res { res.successful? } do |res|
# ...
end
end
Also mind 204 No Content
, since the response body will be nil
.
Don't match on URL pattern. Instead, use response.request.params
to access the request params
in a response
migration, and use the :controller
and :action
params to determine route.
class SomeMigration < RequestMigrations::Migration
# Bad
response if: -> res { res.request.path.matches?(/^\/v1\/posts$/) }
# Good
response if: -> res { res.request.params in controller: 'api/v1/posts', action: 'index' }
end
When you need to entirely change a controller or service class, use a V1x0::UsersController
-style
namespace to keep the old deprecated classes tidy.
class V1x0::UsersController
def foo
# Some old foo action
end
end
Avoid using migrate
for request migrations. If you do, then data migrations, e.g. for
webhooks, will attempt to apply the request migrations. This may erroneously produce bad
output, or even undo a response migration. Instead, keep all request migration logic,
e.g. transforming params, inside of the request
block.
class SomeMigration < RequestMigrations::Migration
# Bad (side-effects for data migrations)
migrate do |params|
params[:foo] = params.delete(:bar)
end
request do |req|
migrate!(req.params)
end
# Good
request do |req|
req.params[:foo] = req.params.delete(:bar)
end
end
Avoid using routing version constraints that remove functionality. They can be a headache during upgrades. Consider only making additive changes. Instead, consider removing or hiding the documentation for old or deprecated endpoints, to limit any new usage.
Rails.application.routes.draw do
resources :users do
# Iffy
version_constraint '< 1.1' do
resources :posts
end
# Good
scope module: :v1x0 do
resources :posts
end
end
end
Avoid introducing n+1 queries in your migrations. Try to utilize the current data you have to perform more meaningful queries, returning only the data needed for the migration.
class AddRecentPostToUsersMigration < RequestMigrations::Migration
description %(adds :recent_post association to a collection of users)
# Bad (n+1)
migrate if: -> data { data in [*, { type: 'user' }, *] do |data|
data.each do |record|
case record
in type: 'user', id:
recent_post = Post.reorder(created_at: :desc)
.find_by(user_id: id)
record[:recent_post] = recent_post&.id
else
end
end
end
# Good
migrate if: -> data { data in [*, { type: 'user' }, *] do |data|
user_ids = data.collect { _1[:id] }
post_ids = Post.select(:id, :user_id)
.distinct_on(:user_id)
.where(user_id: user_ids)
.reorder(created_at: :desc)
.group_by(&:user_id)
data.each do |record|
case record
in type: 'user', id: user_id
record[:recent_post] = post_ids[user_id]&.id
else
end
end
end
response if: -> res { res.successful? && res.request.params in controller: 'api/v1/users',
action: 'index' } do |res|
data = JSON.parse(res.body, symbolize_names: true)
migrate!(data)
res.body = JSON.generate(data)
end
end
Instead of potentially tens or hundreds of queries, we make a single purposeful query to get the data we need in order to complete the migration.
Have a tip of your own? Open a pull request!
Below are some real-world examples of request migrations:
- Migrations: https://github.com/keygen-sh/keygen-api/tree/master/app/migrations
- Tests: https://github.com/keygen-sh/keygen-api/tree/master/spec/migrations
Yes.
Credit goes to Stripe for inspiring the high-level migration strategy. Intercom has another good post on the topic.
If you have an idea, or have discovered a bug, please open an issue or create a pull request.
The gem is available as open source under the terms of the MIT License.