-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 35
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
No cassettes found on vcrpy==5.0.0 release. Works with 4.* #111
Comments
Hi! Thanks for opening an issue! A WIP PR is here |
@Alexander-Serov thanks for the report!
I think you meant raising
I would like to vote for just |
@hartwork agreed on bumping to a major version, and @Stranger6667 Thanks for already working on it! |
I guess the props for working on the issue should go to @gadomski :) At this point, instead of failing in runtime, it would be better to note that |
Hi folks, I see the PR #110 has been suspended for now. Is there any plan or intention in this direction? |
hi @mezhaka ! Yes, I'd like to add support for |
@Stranger6667 thanks for partial, I'll give it another shot right now… |
Pull request #118 now ready for a first round of review. |
Thank you @hartwork ! I'll release a new version this week! :) Hopefully, I could also take a look at the tests that are failing on VCRPy 5.0 |
The new version is released! 🎉 Thank you for your patience |
Describe the bug
vcrpy==5.0
has been released andpytest-recording
does not work with it anymore. Avcrpy
maintainer has indicated that this is related to that VCR.py 5.0.0 is no longer expecting and catching ValueError but a new exception CassetteNotFoundError. Andpytest-recording
seems to not limit the version ofvcr.py
to the current major version, so it broke on upstream upgrade.To Reproduce
Launch any test with
vcrpy==5.0
on cassettes created withvcrpy==4.*
. See here for an example of the output. The main message isExpected behavior
vcrpy~=5.0
and perform major updates manually.Environment (please complete the following information):
does not seem to be pertinent, but
Additional context
Cc @hartwork
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: