Update e2e-kind.sh

[davidhadas]

manual renaming

[knative-prow]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: davidhadas
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign kvmware for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[upodroid]

Can you fix the linting errors suggested by the linter?

[krsna-m]

We was instructed to do so https://cloud-native.slack.com/archives/C04LY4M2G49/p1692208028070579?thread_ts=1692207828.557749&cid=C04LY4M2G49 here before as well.

This will not be merged with failing tests
/hold
until lint tests are fixed

[davidhadas]

The owners of this repo need to fix it.
I am not going to fix repos who have broken lint and other tests not related to renaming.

We was instructed to do so https://cloud-native.slack.com/archives/C04LY4M2G49/p1692208028070579?thread_ts=1692207828.557749&cid=C04LY4M2G49 here before as well.

@kvmware
oh well, if you instructed... obedience is the only way forward...
Your attitude is unacceptable.
And not helpful in any way.

[krsna-m]

Not meant to upset, but part of the agreement for the renaming initiative you requested was that you would have to do more than run a simple sed to rename things and help get repos working with the new rename. So far, you have not done any of that which you agreed to and now extra work is landing on us (infra) and repo owners which was something that we explicitly mentioned that we didnt want to see.

[davidhadas]

Not meant to upset, but part of the agreement for the renaming initiative you requested was that you would have to do more than run a simple sed to rename things and help get repos working with the new rename. So, far you have not done any of that which you agreed to and now extra work is landing on us (infra) and repo owners which was something that was explicitly we didnt want to see.

That is completely incorrect and represent your own attitude against this effort from day 1.

It was explicitly decided that the responsibility is on the owners of the repos to make the changes

I did volunteer to steer this effort, however given what you wrote, until there is a clear decision on this at the TOC and clear agreement as for repo owners taking responsibility, I am not going to volunteer any more of my time to this effort.

[upodroid]

This isn't helpful.

Krsna rightfully felt from the beginning that this was a very large and complex endeavour, but we did a good job so far with mitigating his concerns and delivering it so let's get this over the finish line. The changes the linter is asking for are extremely trivial and far less than we spent on writing these comments.

[davidhadas]

no loger relevant