Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🎁 Don't force the vendoring of deps #311

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 6, 2023

Conversation

cardil
Copy link
Contributor

@cardil cardil commented Sep 5, 2023

Changes

  • 🎁 Don't force the vendoring of deps

/kind enhancement

Fixes #310
Requires #222

Release Note

The vendor directory isn't enforced in Knative projects anymore

@knative-prow
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Sep 5, 2023

Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request.
If you want CI signal for your change, please convert it to an actual PR.
You can still manually trigger a test run with /test all

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. kind/enhancement labels Sep 5, 2023
@knative-prow knative-prow bot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 5, 2023
@cardil cardil changed the title [WIP] 🎁 Don't force the vendoring of deps 🎁 Don't force the vendoring of deps Sep 6, 2023
@cardil cardil marked this pull request as ready for review September 6, 2023 17:07
@knative-prow knative-prow bot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Sep 6, 2023
@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested a review from upodroid September 6, 2023 17:08
@cardil
Copy link
Contributor Author

cardil commented Sep 6, 2023

/cc @kvmware
/cc @upodroid
/cc @mgencur

@knative-prow knative-prow bot requested a review from mgencur September 6, 2023 17:08
Copy link
Member

@upodroid upodroid left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@knative-prow knative-prow bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 6, 2023
@knative-prow
Copy link

knative-prow bot commented Sep 6, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: cardil, upodroid

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@knative-prow knative-prow bot merged commit 760813a into knative:main Sep 6, 2023
15 checks passed
@cardil cardil deleted the feature/vendorless-mode branch September 6, 2023 17:40
@@ -4,4 +4,5 @@ use (
.
schema
test
test/vendorproj
Copy link
Contributor Author

@cardil cardil Sep 6, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

For the record: I added this submodule to test if the scripts allow having a mixed project, with some modules having vendor/ and some don't.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/enhancement lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XXL Denotes a PR that changes 1000+ lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Hack scripts shouldn't enforce vendor dir
2 participants