Look for ko.local in the daemon

[jonjohnsonjr]

Fixes #368

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #371 (229b6b4) into main (23ecf47) will decrease coverage by 0.05%.
The diff coverage is 0.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #371      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   43.43%   43.38%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          33       33              
  Lines        1570     1572       +2     
==========================================
  Hits          682      682              
- Misses        760      761       +1     
- Partials      128      129       +1     

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pkg/commands/config.go	53.75% <0.00%> (-1.38%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 23ecf47...229b6b4. Read the comment docs.

[imjasonh]

Can you also add this to the docs? We might want a quick example of building a base image locally then ko-publishing on top of it, and the ko.local convention would be useful to spell out.

[jonjohnsonjr]

a quick example of ...

We might want a directory with examples to avoid polluting the README? Would also be nice for getting started. Too lazy to do that for this PR :)

[misterikkit]

Are there other places where a ref to ko.local might not resolve to the daemon? Eventually, it would be nice to have a consistent "ko.local means daemon" behavior across all surfaces.

[jonjohnsonjr]

I think this covers everything. We pull base images and push built images, and the base image side probably doesn't receive as much love because (usually) the distroless default base is good enough.

[jonjohnsonjr]

@imjasonh ptal