Improve path checking before route registration

[peterver]

Checklist

• I have ensured my pull request is not behind the main or master branch of the original repository.
• I have rebased all commits where necessary so that reviewing this pull request can be done without having to merge it first.
• I have written a commit message that passes commitlint linting.
• I have ensured that my code changes pass linting tests.
• I have ensured that my code changes pass unit tests.
• I have described my pull request and the reasons for code changes along with context if necessary.

fixes: #147, #148

[peterver]

@wengeezhang @etroynov kindly review once you find some time in your busy schedules

[etroynov]

@3imed-jaberi @niftylettuce can you review it?

[etroynov]

I also recommend you change the title, because someone may not understand that PR is about a specific issue.

It could be something like:
Improve path checking before route registration

and add in description:
fix for issue #147 - it will link your PR with this issue

p.s thx for your help.

[peterver]

I also recommend you change the title, because someone may not understand that PR is about a specific issue.

It could be something like: Improve path checking before route registration

and add in description: fix for issue #147 - it will link your PR with this issue

p.s thx for your help.

@etroynov should be done, I've also improved on the verb specific test by running it against all methods exported in the methods module used by the router, let me know if you agree with that approach. Ps: No worries, happy to help :)

[SagnikPradhan]

You could probably move those checks to a function isValidPath instead but otherwise looks alright. 👍🏻

[titanism]

We have just published @koajs/router v11.0.0 which resolves this issue. This is mirrored to koa-router as well.

https://github.com/koajs/router/releases/tag/v11.0.0

This project is maintained by Forward Email and Lad.

[peterver]

You could probably move those checks to a function isValidPath instead but otherwise looks alright. 👍🏻

@SagnikPradhan Agree :). I'll take a look either tonight or tomorrow to move those bits into utility functions, there's some other parts of the validation which could use some abstraction to ensure code readability, of course I'll write some tests for any PR I open, thanks for the tip :).

[peterver]

We have just published @koajs/router v11.0.0 which resolves this issue. This is mirrored to koa-router as well.

https://github.com/koajs/router/releases/tag/v11.0.0

This project is maintained by Forward Email and Lad.

@titanism awesome! I'll regularly check in and chip in where possible, we're heavy users of koa and koa-router and would want to help maintain :)