Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

koordlet: fix struct type lost of node slo extension #1847

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2024

Conversation

zwzhang0107
Copy link
Contributor

@zwzhang0107 zwzhang0107 commented Jan 16, 2024

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

  • fix lost json annotation in NodeStrategy struct
  • fix the type lost in merging with default value in mergeSLOSpecExtensions

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅳ. Special notes for reviews

V. Checklist

  • I have written necessary docs and comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • All checks passed in make test

Signed-off-by: 佑祎 <zzw261520@alibaba-inc.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 16, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: 8 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (10c2d6b) 67.04% compared to head (25ddf99) 67.04%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
pkg/koordlet/statesinformer/impl/states_nodeslo.go 0.00% 7 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1847      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   67.04%   67.04%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         407      407              
  Lines       45716    45721       +5     
==========================================
+ Hits        30651    30654       +3     
  Misses      12828    12828              
- Partials     2237     2239       +2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 67.04% <0.00%> (-0.01%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@jasonliu747 jasonliu747 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@saintube
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

Copy link
Member

@FillZpp FillZpp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@koordinator-bot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: FillZpp, jasonliu747, saintube

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@koordinator-bot koordinator-bot bot merged commit acc9a87 into koordinator-sh:main Jan 17, 2024
20 checks passed
saintube pushed a commit to saintube/koordinator that referenced this pull request Feb 22, 2024
saintube pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
Signed-off-by: 佑祎 <zzw261520@alibaba-inc.com>
saintube pushed a commit to saintube/koordinator that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
…1847)

Signed-off-by: 佑祎 <zzw261520@alibaba-inc.com>
saintube pushed a commit to saintube/koordinator that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
…1847)

Signed-off-by: 佑祎 <zzw261520@alibaba-inc.com>
saintube pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
Signed-off-by: 佑祎 <zzw261520@alibaba-inc.com>
ls-2018 pushed a commit to ls-2018/koordinator that referenced this pull request Mar 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants