Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

scheduler: correct NodeNUMAResource handling with NodeFullPCPUsOnly and preferredCPUBindPolicy #1891

Conversation

eahydra
Copy link
Member

@eahydra eahydra commented Feb 4, 2024

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

Bug caused when requiredCPUBindPolicy was introduced.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

fix #1890

Ⅲ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅳ. Special notes for reviews

V. Checklist

  • I have written necessary docs and comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • All checks passed in make test

…nd preferredCPUBindPolicy

Signed-off-by: Joseph <joseph.t.lee@outlook.com>
@eahydra eahydra requested a review from ZiMengSheng February 4, 2024 07:32
@eahydra eahydra force-pushed the fix_nodenumaresource_node_fullcpus_only branch from 8544dd0 to f089122 Compare February 4, 2024 07:32
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (451740f) 67.53% compared to head (f089122) 67.54%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1891      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.53%   67.54%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         413      413              
  Lines       46070    46072       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits        31114    31120       +6     
+ Misses      12706    12702       -4     
  Partials     2250     2250              
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 67.54% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@ZiMengSheng
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@hormes
Copy link
Member

hormes commented Feb 4, 2024

/approve

@koordinator-bot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: hormes

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@koordinator-bot koordinator-bot bot merged commit 93f2bc2 into koordinator-sh:main Feb 4, 2024
20 checks passed
saintube pushed a commit to saintube/koordinator that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
…nd preferredCPUBindPolicy (koordinator-sh#1891)

Signed-off-by: Joseph <joseph.t.lee@outlook.com>
saintube pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
…nd preferredCPUBindPolicy (#1891)

Signed-off-by: Joseph <joseph.t.lee@outlook.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] failed case: enable Node FullPCPUsOnly and request bind CPU with preferredCPUBindPolicy
3 participants