Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

scheduler: no rejecting sbiling when invalid scheduling cycle #1999

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 12, 2024

Conversation

ZiMengSheng
Copy link
Contributor

@ZiMengSheng ZiMengSheng commented Apr 12, 2024

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

PodA1 invalid cycle PreFilter 会 Reject 已经 assumed 的兄弟 Gang GangB的 Pod,然后兄弟GangB 会将 GangA 的 cycle++;然后 GangA 继续 invalid cycle ......,就会一直循环下去;

之所以选择在 PreFilter 里面改,而不是在 PostFilter 通过判断 cycleValid 决定是否reject,是因为 PostFilter 逻辑无法判断是因为什么原因导致的 cycleInvalid,有可能cycle 一开始就是 invalid的,然后现在用户删除了gang 或者 pod ,这种情况也是需要reject的,否则会导致死锁

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅳ. Special notes for reviews

V. Checklist

  • I have written necessary docs and comments
  • I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
  • All checks passed in make test

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 12, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 80.76923% with 5 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 68.68%. Comparing base (252c29d) to head (bf2848e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files Patch % Lines
pkg/scheduler/plugins/coscheduling/coscheduling.go 73.33% 4 Missing ⚠️
pkg/scheduler/plugins/coscheduling/core/core.go 90.90% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1999      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   68.70%   68.68%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         421      421              
  Lines       38822    38845      +23     
==========================================
+ Hits        26672    26682      +10     
- Misses       9842     9851       +9     
- Partials     2308     2312       +4     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 68.68% <80.76%> (-0.02%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Signed-off-by: wangjianyu.wjy <wangjianyu.wjy@alibaba-inc.com>
Copy link
Contributor

@buptcozy buptcozy left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@koordinator-bot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: buptcozy

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@koordinator-bot koordinator-bot bot merged commit 19c19e0 into koordinator-sh:main Apr 12, 2024
20 checks passed
georgexiang pushed a commit to ocichina/koordinator that referenced this pull request Apr 15, 2024
…nator-sh#1999)

Signed-off-by: wangjianyu.wjy <wangjianyu.wjy@alibaba-inc.com>
Co-authored-by: wangjianyu.wjy <wangjianyu.wjy@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: george <xiangzhihua@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants