koord-scheduler: modify cpu and memory quantity formats and scales

[xulinfei1996]

Signed-off-by: xulinfei.xlf xulinfei.xlf@alibaba-inc.com

Ⅰ. Describe what this PR does

Change pod's cpu quantity to MilliQuantity in order to calculate runtimeQuota correctly, change memory's format from DecimalSI to BinarySI, fix UT.

Ⅱ. Does this pull request fix one issue?

Ⅲ. Describe how to verify it

Ⅳ. Special notes for reviews

V. Checklist

• I have written necessary docs and comments
• I have added necessary unit tests and integration tests
• All checks passed in make test

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Base: 68.85% // Head: 68.86% // Increases project coverage by +0.01% 🎉

Coverage data is based on head (790a5dc) compared to base (f89f000).
Patch coverage: 88.23% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #675      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   68.85%   68.86%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         204      204              
  Lines       22962    22977      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits        15811    15824      +13     
- Misses       6052     6054       +2     
  Partials     1099     1099              

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	68.86% <88.23%> (+0.01%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
...gins/elasticquota/core/runtime_quota_calculator.go	88.23% <86.20%> (-0.09%)	⬇️
.../scheduler/plugins/elasticquota/core/quota_info.go	85.16% <100.00%> (ø)
...ticquota/core/scale_minquota_when_over_root_res.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
pkg/util/httputil/reverseproxy.go	84.30% <0.00%> (-0.80%)	⬇️
...duler/plugins/elasticquota/quota_overuse_revoke.go	80.23% <0.00%> (+1.79%)	⬆️

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

[buptcozy]

/lgtm

[buptcozy]

/lgtm

[eahydra]

/lgtm

[koordinator-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.

This pull-request has been approved by: buptcozy, eahydra

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment