Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: support setting iptables mode #315

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 13, 2023

Conversation

OrangeBao
Copy link
Contributor

@OrangeBao OrangeBao commented Dec 7, 2023

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What does this PR do?

Which issue(s) does this PR fix?

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

@OrangeBao OrangeBao changed the title fix: support choice iptables mode fix: support setting iptables mode Dec 7, 2023
@OrangeBao OrangeBao changed the title fix: support setting iptables mode draft: support setting iptables mode Dec 7, 2023
@OrangeBao OrangeBao force-pushed the fix_iptablesmode branch 3 times, most recently from eb1aa86 to c881b27 Compare December 7, 2023 07:07
@OrangeBao OrangeBao changed the title draft: support setting iptables mode feat: support setting iptables mode Dec 7, 2023
Signed-off-by: OrangeBao <baoyinghai_yewu@cmss.chinamobile.com>
@wuyingjun-lucky
Copy link
Member

/approve

@kosmos-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: OrangeBao, wuyingjun-lucky

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@wuyingjun-lucky
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@kosmos-robot kosmos-robot merged commit 111f549 into kosmos-io:main Dec 13, 2023
6 of 7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants