Improve annotated default detection

[koxudaxi]

Fixes: #731

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (b2597b5) 72.19% compared to head (d50a5b1) 72.19%.

Files	Patch %	Lines
src/com/koxudaxi/pydantic/Pydantic.kt	57.14%	0 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #856   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   72.19%   72.19%           
=======================================
  Files          27       27           
  Lines        2093     2093           
  Branches      643      643           
=======================================
  Hits         1511     1511           
  Misses        276      276           
  Partials      306      306           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Qodana Community for Python

It seems all right 👌

No new problems were found according to the checks applied

💡 Qodana analysis was run in the pull request mode: only the changed files were checked

View the detailed Qodana report

To be able to view the detailed Qodana report, you can either:

1. Register at Qodana Cloud and configure the action
2. Use GitHub Code Scanning with Qodana
3. Host Qodana report at GitHub Pages
4. Inspect and use qodana.sarif.json (see the Qodana SARIF format for details)

To get *.log files or any other Qodana artifacts, run the action with upload-result option set to true,
so that the action will upload the files as the job artifacts:

      - name: 'Qodana Scan'
        uses: JetBrains/qodana-action@v2023.3.0
        with:
          upload-result: true

Contact Qodana team

Contact us at qodana-support@jetbrains.com

• Or via our issue tracker: https://jb.gg/qodana-issue
• Or share your feedback: https://jb.gg/qodana-discussions

[Tshimanga]

@koxudaxi just a quick question, i see that this is tested only with default_factory. is there a reason for not also having a test case with default? (that's the flavor of error I had run into with this)

thanks regardless! :)

[koxudaxi]

@Tshimanga
I expect only default_factory. because, pydantic v1 don't allow default in the annotated Field.
But, Pydantic V2 doesn't say any error. I will fix it in another PR.

[koxudaxi]

Thank you!!