-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 508
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ARM version #51
Comments
Thanks; it's not the first time the issue of cross-compiling comes up (see: #30). I'll take another look. Thanks! |
Thanks! I read that issue before write this. But I was thinking that could be good idea to comment that there is a workaround until a official solution. Kind regards! |
Is there anyway to get this working on a Raspberry PI? I don't mind a work around, but it appears this issue has been abandoned. What needs to be done still to get the ARM compile done? |
This issue is about providing pre built binaries for ARM, which is a build system issue - I need to cross compile for ARM, but testing the resulting binary is the harder part. However, Tini compiles as-is for ARM, there's no extra work to do on that front. You have two options to use it on a Pi:
|
Also, if you prefer, you can use my compilation that I share in my repo https://github.com/ind3x/rpi-tini. It has been tested in a Raspberry Pi 2. |
@krallin It'd be great if cross compilation can be added for arm64. For now I'm building and releasing them here https://github.com/Project31/tini. I have a jenkins instance on arm64, so if you want to setup some automated testing then please let me know. |
hi, I'm start to port Dockerfile to armhf devices https://github.com/Valantin/rpimage based on armhf semiofficial image https://hub.docker.com/r/armhf/. I'm intrested to a cross-compiled version of tini in the official repository |
Hey everyone here, I have some good news: official ARM builds of Tini 😄 Please this give this latest pre-release a shot: https://github.com/krallin/tini/releases/tag/v0.11.0.pre1. These are cross-builds, so while I've tested them myself on VMs, I'm interested in hearing a bit of feedback from ARM users before I merge those into an official release :) I still have a little fix to do in #54, but this is pretty close. Thanks for your patience! Cheers, |
Great :). I'm traveling now but will give it a go later this week. Thx! |
Great news!! I'm going to test it this days in my projects for being sure that works fine in my RPi 2. |
Awesome; thanks for giving it a shot. Note that if you're on a RPI, the binary you want is the Cheers, |
Yes! I let you know about result and also, in case of working fine, I will deprecate mi forked repository. |
Hi again! I tested following the most common configuration:
and seems like it works fine. As an anotation, when I execute tini -h the output prints tini (version 0.10.0 - git.271c097) instead of version 0.11.0.
|
Perfect, thanks for testing. It's expected that the version reports a lower number since I have not On Monday, 31 October 2016, Imanol Urra notifications@github.com wrote:
|
I just released Tini 0.11.0, which now includes ARM builds! 😄 Let me know if you run into any trouble of course. Cheers, |
Hi @krallin, just for notify, I've deprecated the forked repo I created a month ago in favor of yours 😄. |
Sounds good; thanks @ind3x |
All looks good on arm64 too. Cheers! --Kurt On Sun, Oct 30, 2016 at 1:20 PM, Kurt Stam kstam@redhat.com wrote:
Kurt T. Stam twitter: @KurtStam |
Hi,
Actually I have been porting official Docker images for Elasticsearch, Logstash and Kibana to Raspberry with the intention of having a RPi version similar to officials ones.
Due to this reason I forked the repository with de purpouse of bulding a ARM (tested on RPi 2, ARMv7) version of Tini (https://github.com/ind3x/rpi-tini).
Would you mind to build and ARM version? I think that could be such a good idea to have option.
Kind regards!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: