List based block access #138
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
… than being in the autogenerated code
…eaking change for users
… of a breaking change for users" This reverts commit 760b49d.
…sa. Finding a bug in the process
… versions with auto fomratting to be reduced
…with the autoformatting crashing
… it work with the call backs and not wrapping lines
krcb197
deleted the
137-error-generating-reading-from-mem-with-memwidth-64-bits
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previous versions used the python array.array object to pass around clocks of data, including:
The issue is that python array has a maximum width of 64 bits, however, system rdl supports wider memory types. In order to overcome this the functions were charged to using list.
Unfortunately, this would have been a breaking API change, therefore a legacy mode has been preserved to allow people to build the register model without problems but this requires the use of the
legacy_block_accesswhich will be removed at some point in the future.