Redux

[cmnstmntmn]

redux as a flux alternative

Watch Dan Abramov's talk on Hot Reloading with Time Travel.

Ref #579

Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.

[timdoes]

+1

[tanertopal]

👍

[Hyra]

😸

[mirchiseth]

+1

[nurrony]

+1

[vkammerer]

+1

[sebastianpicklum]

+1

[dvic]

+1

[rustanacexd]

+1 yes please

[dzcpy]

+1

[tconroy]

👍 !!!

[learntoswim]

+1

[buildbreakdo]

+1

[rusenask]

could we get some kind of discussion here instead of "+1" ? I am also for redux as it looks like a better and cleaner approach although it would be interesting to hear other opinions.

[tconroy]

@rusenask I mean... that pretty much sums it up. It's a cleaner flux architecture pattern, and rapidly becoming the community favorite implementation. We could fork this starter kit into two variants (a Flux and a Redux version) if the maintainer isn't interested in swapping out for Redux, but I think it would be in the best interest of the community to do so.

[langpavel]

@koistya I'm interesting in implementing redux in this project. Will be PR possibly accepted? I'm preparing another PR for react-intl support but I need some state sharing for selected language and other react-intl configuration

[koistya]

@langpavel yes, it can be merged into feature/redux branch for now. The problem is that many developer prefer Relay over Redux. I need to conduct a poll to check how many RSK users would like to see Redux on the master branch, how many Relay, and how many would like to keep it Flux-agnostic.

[langpavel]

@koistya I'm interesting in Relay too. I thing that can be possible and beneficial to have both but this will need some more digging

[koistya]

A bare minimum Redux integration (example): #883