Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Address backtick inconsistencies #43

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Address backtick inconsistencies #43

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

kriskowal
Copy link
Owner

In prior changes, we revised the tick notation to be a backtick notation
and also eliminate the phoneme input normalizer.
In the process, X became distinguishable from KS and it did not make
sense any longer for the X notation to degerate to KS, but remained sensible to have KS notation to explicitly opt-out of consolidation
into the special calma S-hook.

This change corrects the documentation and also catches some ticks
previously missed.

In prior changes, we revised the tick notation to be a backtick notation
and also eliminate the phoneme input normalizer.
In the process, X became distinguishable from KS and it did not make
sense any longer for the X` notation to degerate to KS, but remained
sensible to have KS` notation to explicitly opt-out of consolidation
into the special calma S-hook.

This change corrects the documentation and also catches some ticks
previously missed.
@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 27, 2019

This pull request is being automatically deployed with ZEIT Now (learn more).
To see the status of your deployment, click below or on the icon next to each commit.

🔍 Inspect: https://zeit.co/kriskowal/tengwarjs/hjbbecp78
🌍 Preview: https://tengwarjs-git-ticksistency.kriskowal.now.sh

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant