-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
About ndcg #1
Comments
The NDCG scores reported in the paper are based on a wrong implementation
of NDCG. We have fixed it in the github but haven't revised the paper yet.
We will revise the paper soon.
In the readme file, we have provided the correct NDCG scores.
…On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 11:56 PM 刘昊东 ***@***.***> wrote:
Hi, thanks for your work.
I used the hyper parameters you provide in the examples to run your code,
though I can obtain satisfactory results about Recall on both three
datasets, but the results about NDCG are far smaller than what you report
in the paper.
I am wondering what is suitable hyper parameters to obtain the result
reported in your paper. Thanks.
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAI3DDVVGXMU6A76FKFCEW3RKYBJTANCNFSM4L4GKGNQ>
.
--
Xiangnan HE (Dr) :: Professor :: Vice Dean, School of Data Science ::
University of Science and Technology of China (USTC) :: 443 Huangshan Road,
Hefei, China 230027 :: (0551) 63607236 (DID) :: hexn@ustc.edu.cn (E) ::
http://staff.ustc.edu.cn/~hexn/ (W)
|
Thanks for your reply. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hi, thanks for your work.
I used the hyper parameters you provide in the examples to run your code, though I can obtain satisfactory results about Recall on both three datasets, but the results about NDCG are far smaller than what you report in the paper.
I am wondering what is suitable hyper parameters to obtain the result reported in your paper. Thanks.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: