Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(deploy) Allow setting additional values in operator chart #1904

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 3, 2025

Conversation

bakito
Copy link
Contributor

@bakito bakito commented Nov 27, 2024

Purpose of PR?:

This PR allows defining adidional values in the operator helm chart. (resources/podLabels/podAnnotations/podSecurityContext/securityContext)

Fixes -

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
no

If the changes in this PR are manually verified, list down the scenarios covered::
Installed helm chart without and with new values

Additional information for reviewer? :

Checklist:

  • Bug fix. Fixes #
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
  • This change requires a documentation update
  • PR Title follows the convention of <type>(<scope>): <subject>
  • Commit has unit tests
  • Commit has integration tests

…rityContext/securityContext in operator chart

Signed-off-by: bakito <github@bakito.ch>
Copy link
Collaborator

@rksharma95 rksharma95 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀, thanks for the PR @bakito

Copy link
Member

@rootxrishabh rootxrishabh left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM 🚀
TY!

@rksharma95 rksharma95 merged commit f390269 into kubearmor:main Jan 3, 2025
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants