Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add dependabot config script #64

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

davidspek
Copy link

Inspired by kubeflow/pipelines#4682 I created a script that will create a config file for depandabot so that it knows what directories to scan. It will scan the repository for files named *ockerfile*, package*.json, *requirements.txt, go.* and Gemfile*. It is setup for dockerfiles, npm packages, pip, ruby and gomod dependencies at the moment. It is trivial to further customize what folders are selected if further customization is needed. It also parses the closest OWNERS file for a given dependency listing file, and assigns the relevant approvers and adds the relevant reviewers to the PRs it creates.

This is a sibling PR to kubeflow/pipelines#5015, kubeflow/kubeflow#5542, kserve/kserve#1309, kubeflow/arena#403, kubeflow/testing#855, kubeflow/fairing#550, kubeflow/kfp-tekton#432, kubeflow/katib#1420, kubeflow/training-operator#1224, kubeflow/kfp-tekton-backend#28, kubeflow/mpi-operator#319, kubeflow/pytorch-operator#315, kubeflow/metadata#255, kubeflow/xgboost-operator#107, kubeflow/fate-operator#26, kubeflow/mxnet-operator#87, kubeflow/website#2459, kubeflow/kfctl#479, kubeflow/examples#843, kubeflow/code-intelligence#198, GoogleCloudPlatform/kubeflow-distribution#192 and kubeflow/common#107.

As it stands now, there will be about 11 PRs that will be created with this configuration.

For reference, the PRs that will be created can be found here: https://github.com/DavidSpek/blog/pulls

@davidspek
Copy link
Author

/assign kramachandran

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@davidspek: GitHub didn't allow me to assign the following users: kramachandran.

Note that only kubeflow members, repo collaborators and people who have commented on this issue/PR can be assigned. Additionally, issues/PRs can only have 10 assignees at the same time.
For more information please see the contributor guide

In response to this:

/assign kramachandran

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@davidspek
Copy link
Author

/assign @terrytangyuan

Copy link
Member

@terrytangyuan terrytangyuan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: DavidSpek, terrytangyuan
To complete the pull request process, please assign after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@davidspek
Copy link
Author

davidspek commented Jan 25, 2021

@terrytangyuan I wasn't able to assign the owner of the repo @kramachandran as he isn't a member of Kubeflow. Who should be assigned to approve this?

@davidspek
Copy link
Author

I am holding the PR to have some control over when it gets merged so that the optional test infra doesn't get overloaded if all the repo's were to merge this at the same time.
/hold

@Bobgy
Copy link
Contributor

Bobgy commented Apr 6, 2021

I think we don't need this for kubeflow/blog, do we?

@davidspek
Copy link
Author

@Bobgy does look like there are things that need to be kept up to date.
https://github.com/DavidSpek/blog/pulls

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants