-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 443
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support Kubeflow operators to ROADMAP #1145
Add support Kubeflow operators to ROADMAP #1145
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
thanks for this
- Add validation for algorithms (a.k.a suggestions) [#1126](https://github.com/kubeflow/katib/issues/1126) | ||
- Katib UI fixes and enhancements |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Katib UI fixes and enhancements | |
- Katib UI fixes and enhancements | |
- Investigate Kubeflow Metadata integration |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks, updated!
ROADMAP.md
Outdated
|
||
- Delete Suggestion deployment after Experiment is finished [#1061](https://github.com/kubeflow/katib/issues/1061) | ||
- Save Suggestion state after deployment is deleted [#1062](https://github.com/kubeflow/katib/issues/1062) | ||
- Reconsider the design of Trial Template [#906](https://github.com/kubeflow/katib/issues/906) | ||
- Support new Kubeflow operators (MXNet, XGBoost, MPI) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we come up with an extensible model for supporting different operators? Maybe rephrase this
- Design an extensible model for integrating with custom resources
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
+1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agree, updated.
Also another item we discussed would be good to add to roadmap - a best case effort to investigate the alignment with concept and implementation of "experiments" and "jobs/runs" in KFP |
Ok, I updated ROADMAP with this issue. |
/lgtm |
/approve |
/hold |
@andreyvelich Let me know if it is ready to merge. |
@animeshsingh @jlewi @johnugeorge Are you fine with these changes? |
As there are no more changes, merging the PR /approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: gaocegege, johnugeorge The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/hold cancel |
* Add support operators to ROADMAP * Rename HP to Common * Add metadata to ROADMAP * Rename operators step * Add step for KFP * Add link to Kubeflow issue
I updated ROADMAP with support MXNet, XGBoost, MPI operator.
Also, I renamed Hyperparameter Tuning to Common, since this steps are related to HP and NAS.
/assign @johnugeorge @gaocegege
/cc @animeshsingh