-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 443
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/waitallprocesses config #1394
Feature/waitallprocesses config #1394
Conversation
Hi @robbertvdg. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubeflow member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@andreyvelich can you take a look at this? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for doing this @robbertvdg!
I left few comments.
/ok-to-test
/cc @gaocegege @johnugeorge
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ var ( | |||
metricFilters = flag.String("f", "", "Metric filters") | |||
pollInterval = flag.Duration("p", common.DefaultPollInterval, "Poll interval between running processes check") | |||
timeout = flag.Duration("timeout", common.DefaultTimeout, "Timeout before invoke error during running processes check") | |||
waitAll = flag.Bool("w", common.DefaultWaitAll, "Whether wait for all other main process of container exiting") | |||
waitAllProcesses = flag.String("w", common.DefaultWaitAllProcesses, "Whether wait for all other main process of container exiting") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need to keep this flag String
, or we can use Bool
?
I assume this flag can be only true
or false
.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I had problems with parsing booleans when a user has not specified the field in the katib-config. Do you know of a good way to do it?
I could leave it string in the katib-config and parse it to bool in GetMetricsCollectorConfigData
, would that be better?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@robbertvdg It seems that empty bool
in Go is false
. So when user doesn't specify any values in config we send "false" to the metrics collector.
Maybe we can define MetricsCollectorConfig
like this:
type MetricsCollectorConfig struct {
Image string `json:"image"`
ImagePullPolicy corev1.PullPolicy `json:"imagePullPolicy"`
Resource corev1.ResourceRequirements `json:"resources"`
WaitAllProcesses *bool `json:"waitAllProcesses"`
}
In that case, you can set -w
flag if WaitAllProcesses != nil
. Otherwise the default value is set.
In Katib config I was able to define bool value like this:
"StdOut": {
"image": "docker.io/andreyvelichkevich/file-metrics-collector",
"imagePullPolicy": "Always",
"waitAllProcesses": false
},
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The problem lies with the v1.Container.args
which is string[]
. Therefore every container argument has to be a string, which I think is not compatible with the flag.Bool() argument (I tested it, doesn't work).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@robbertvdg Got it.
In that case can we keep WaitAllProcesses *bool
in MetricsCollectorConfig
, convert it to string here:
args = append(args, "-w", metricsCollectorConfigData.WaitAllProcesses) |
Then, use the String type like you did in Metrics Collector and convert it to Bool after.
In that case, we can avoid situation when user specify wrong values in Katib config.
What do you think @robbertvdg @gaocegege ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@andreyvelich those were my thoughts as well, will update PR soon.
@@ -353,10 +353,16 @@ func main() { | |||
go printMetricsFile(*metricsFilePath) | |||
} | |||
|
|||
waitAll, err := strconv.ParseBool(*waitAllProcesses) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we keep it Bool
, we can skip conversion.
Image string `json:"image"` | ||
ImagePullPolicy corev1.PullPolicy `json:"imagePullPolicy"` | ||
Resource corev1.ResourceRequirements `json:"resources"` | ||
WaitAllProcesses string `json:"waitAllProcesses"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Same as above, can we keep it bool
?
Image string `json:"image"` | ||
ImagePullPolicy corev1.PullPolicy `json:"imagePullPolicy"` | ||
Resource corev1.ResourceRequirements `json:"resources"` | ||
Image string `json:"image"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should we add omitempty for the fieds?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can add it on all parameters but Image
.
@andreyvelich @gaocegege updated PR, can you do a final check? |
Image string `json:"image"` | ||
ImagePullPolicy corev1.PullPolicy `json:"imagePullPolicy,omitempty"` | ||
Resource corev1.ResourceRequirements `json:"resources,omitempty"` | ||
WaitAllProcesses *bool `json:"waitAllProcesses,omitempty"` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add omitempty
to the SuggestionConfig
also please ? It should be in all parameters but Image
.
@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ def parse_options(): | |||
logger.addHandler(handler) | |||
logger.propagate = False | |||
opt = parse_options() | |||
wait_all_processes = opt.wait_all_processes.lower() == "true" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does this compare (opt.wait_all_processes.lower() == "true"
) necessary ?
I assume wait_all_processes
can be only "true" or "false" since WaitAllProcesses *bool
in Katib config?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is the python way of converting string to bool ;) should be fine since the string can only have two possibilities
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your contribution @robbertvdg!
/lgtm
/cc @gaocegege
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: andreyvelich, robbertvdg The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
/hold |
/hold cancel |
Thanks for your contribution! 🎉 👍 |
What this PR does / why we need it:
Adds the waitAllProcesses option to the katib-config metricsCollector spec. It is made optional, defaulting to true.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes
See #1383 for discussion
Special notes for your reviewer:
Release note: