Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve generic list and namespacedlist #184

Conversation

DanyT
Copy link
Contributor

@DanyT DanyT commented Apr 21, 2023

  • allow empty apiGroup
  • select rest api path based on apiGroup value

- allow empty apiGroup
- select rest api path based on apiGroup value
@linux-foundation-easycla
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Apr 21, 2023

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 21, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @DanyT!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-client/c 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-client/c has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Apr 21, 2023
@DanyT
Copy link
Contributor Author

DanyT commented Apr 21, 2023

a usage like the one bellow will not select the correct rest api path

genericClient = genericClient_create(apiClient, "", "v1", "pods");
char *list = Generic_listNamespaced(genericClient, "default");

a usage like the one below will result in segfault as strdup need non null input

genericClient = genericClient_create(apiClient, NULL, "v1", "pods");
char *list = Generic_listNamespaced(genericClient, "default");

@ityuhui
Copy link
Member

ityuhui commented Apr 22, 2023

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Apr 22, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: DanyT, ityuhui

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 22, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit dcd994d into kubernetes-client:master Apr 22, 2023
@ityuhui
Copy link
Member

ityuhui commented Apr 22, 2023

Thank you for fixing this issue !

Do you want to solve the second problem you pointed out?

a usage like the one below will result in segfault as strdup need non null input

I think the following might be a fix:

genericClient_t* genericClient_create(apiClient_t *client, const char *apiGroup, const char* apiVersion, const char* resourcePlural) {
     ...
     result->apiGroup = apiGroup ? strdup(apiGroup) : NULL;
     ...
}

void genericClient_free(genericClient_t* client) {
    if (client->apiGroup) {
        free(client->apiGroup);
    }
    ...
}

@DanyT
Copy link
Contributor Author

DanyT commented Apr 24, 2023

yep. will do another pr soon.

@DanyT DanyT mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants