Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add CSI sanity tests for node volume expansion #273

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jun 10, 2020

Conversation

gnufied
Copy link
Contributor

@gnufied gnufied commented Jun 8, 2020

These sanity tests verify drivers implementation of NodeExpandVolume RPC call. We always call NodeExpandVolume after NodePublish and it is expected that if a driver supports node-expansion it must correctly expand the volume if NodeExpandVolume is called after NodePublish.

Add CSI sanity tests for NodeExpandVolume call.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. label Jun 8, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from lpabon and pohly June 8, 2020 03:46
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Jun 8, 2020
@gnufied gnufied force-pushed the add-santity-test branch from 8826c04 to e582823 Compare June 8, 2020 04:23
@gnufied
Copy link
Contributor Author

gnufied commented Jun 8, 2020

/assign @xing-yang @jsafrane

@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor

In the description, can you clarify that NodeExpandVolume will be called after NodePublishVolume?

@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 10, 2020
@gnufied
Copy link
Contributor Author

gnufied commented Jun 10, 2020

@xing-yang done.

@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

@xing-yang
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @pohly can you help approve?

Copy link
Contributor

@pohly pohly left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: gnufied, pohly, xing-yang

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 10, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 343a8c7 into kubernetes-csi:master Jun 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants