Bump GCR sidecars that reference broken tags

[ConnorJC3]

Is this a bug fix or adding new feature?

Bug fix

What is this PR about? / Why do we need it?

Fixes #2090

What testing is done?

Manually tested but long-term we need a CI job for each overlay that runs on release-* branches

$ kubectl apply -k deploy/kubernetes/overlays/stable/gcr                          
serviceaccount/ebs-csi-controller-sa created
serviceaccount/ebs-csi-node-sa created
role.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/ebs-csi-leases-role created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/ebs-csi-node-role created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/ebs-external-attacher-role created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/ebs-external-provisioner-role created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/ebs-external-resizer-role created
clusterrole.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/ebs-external-snapshotter-role created
rolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/ebs-csi-leases-rolebinding created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/ebs-csi-attacher-binding created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/ebs-csi-node-getter-binding created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/ebs-csi-provisioner-binding created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/ebs-csi-resizer-binding created
clusterrolebinding.rbac.authorization.k8s.io/ebs-csi-snapshotter-binding created
deployment.apps/ebs-csi-controller created
poddisruptionbudget.policy/ebs-csi-controller created
daemonset.apps/ebs-csi-node created
csidriver.storage.k8s.io/ebs.csi.aws.com created

$ kubectl -n kube-system get pods | grep ebs-csi
ebs-csi-controller-d4f8c896c-gxqql              6/6     Running   0             30s
ebs-csi-controller-d4f8c896c-phzxf              6/6     Running   0             30s
ebs-csi-node-d6gzx                              3/3     Running   0             30s
ebs-csi-node-jds59                              3/3     Running   0             29s
ebs-csi-node-qw5w5                              3/3     Running   0             30s
ebs-csi-node-s6ppm                              3/3     Running   0             30s

[github-actions]

Code Coverage Diff

This PR does not change the code coverage

[torredil]

/lgtm

[AndrewSirenko]

/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AndrewSirenko

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [AndrewSirenko]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment