Resize filesystem when restore a snapshot to larger size volume

[AndyXiangLi]

Is this a bug fix or adding new feature?
Fixes: #569
What is this PR about? / Why do we need it?
continue from #595
Before NodePublishVolume, we will check if the device size is matched with the usable filesystem size. And resize the filesystem if there is a mismatch
TODO: Upstream is planning on move the common resize code to kubernetes/mount-util, #99223, we should use the resize function from there instead of maintaining our own once the changes are available
What testing is done?
Test done in both ext[x] and xfs filesystem

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @AndyXiangLi. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[coveralls]

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 1887

• 57 of 109 (52.29%) changed or added relevant lines in 2 files are covered.
• No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
• Overall coverage decreased (-1.3%) to 79.228%

---

Changes Missing Coverage	Covered Lines	Changed/Added Lines	%
pkg/driver/node.go	7	14	50.0%
pkg/driver/mount.go	50	95	52.63%

Totals
Change from base Build 1886:	-1.3%
Covered Lines:	1949
Relevant Lines:	2460

---

💛 - Coveralls

[gnufied]

This is similar to #595 cc @jsafrane

[ayberk]

/ok-to-test

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: AndyXiangLi

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [AndyXiangLi]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[AndyXiangLi]

/test pull-aws-ebs-csi-driver-verify

[gnufied]

@AndyXiangLi did you merge it intentionally? I don't think it was reviewed. :-) cc @wongma7

[AndyXiangLi]

@AndyXiangLi did you merge it intentionally? I don't think it was reviewed. :-) cc @wongma7

We talked about this offline and decide to merge it for now. Will update once the upstream is merged
kubernetes/kubernetes#101253

[wongma7]

(retroactive)
/lgtm

yea, let's merge stuff only when lgtm + approve present. I frequently manually merge stuff when those are present in case coveralls is bugged (it's already marked NOT required, but prow bot treats it as required for some reason), otherwise no reason to manual merge