Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-1.11] add transient error handling to AMMP delete #4047

Conversation

k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #4039

/assign nojnhuh

Fixed a bug causing transient errors in AzureManagedMachinePool reconciliation to requeue too aggressively

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. label Sep 28, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Sep 28, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 28, 2023
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 3 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (1846b96) 56.63% compared to head (8d2e5f5) 56.65%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on release-1.11.

Additional details and impacted files
@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           release-1.11    #4047      +/-   ##
================================================
+ Coverage         56.63%   56.65%   +0.02%     
================================================
  Files               187      187              
  Lines             19131    19139       +8     
================================================
+ Hits              10834    10844      +10     
+ Misses             7668     7666       -2     
  Partials            629      629              
Files Coverage Δ
controllers/azuremanagedmachinepool_controller.go 56.14% <66.66%> (+1.14%) ⬆️

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@mboersma mboersma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 28, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: fdb7a08f41d6ff4b2fbca8a9bdc0fd7900af75bf

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mboersma

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 28, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8953583 into kubernetes-sigs:release-1.11 Sep 28, 2023
18 checks passed
@mboersma mboersma added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. area/managedclusters Issues related to managed AKS clusters created through the CAPZ ManagedCluster Type labels Sep 28, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/managedclusters Issues related to managed AKS clusters created through the CAPZ ManagedCluster Type cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants