[release-1.11] Restart containerd in ipv6 templates when restarting systemd-resolved

[CecileRobertMichon]

What type of PR is this?

/kind failing-test

What this PR does / why we need it: Cherry-pick part of #4209 (the ci-version templates only exist in the main branch so this wasn't a clean cherry-pick).

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

• cherry-pick candidate

TODOs:

• squashed commits
• includes documentation
• adds unit tests

Release note:

Restart containerd in ipv6 templates when restarting systemd-resolved

[nojnhuh]

/test ls

[k8s-ci-robot]

@nojnhuh: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

• /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apiversion-upgrade-v1beta1
• /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-build-v1beta1
• /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-ci-entrypoint-v1beta1
• /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-aks-v1beta1
• /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-v1beta1
• /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-workload-upgrade-v1beta1
• /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-test-v1beta1
• /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-verify-v1beta1

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

• /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apidiff-v1beta1
• /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-capi-e2e-v1beta1
• /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-v1beta1
• /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-conformance-with-ci-artifacts-v1beta1
• /test pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-optional-v1beta1

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

• pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apidiff-v1beta1
• pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-apiversion-upgrade-v1beta1
• pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-build-v1beta1
• pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-capi-e2e-v1beta1
• pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-ci-entrypoint-v1beta1
• pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-aks-v1beta1
• pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-e2e-v1beta1
• pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-test-v1beta1
• pull-cluster-api-provider-azure-verify-v1beta1

In response to this:

/test ls

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[nojnhuh]

@CecileRobertMichon Do we not have conformance-dual-stack and conformance-ipv6 jobs for the release branch?

[nojnhuh]

/lgtm
/approve

[k8s-ci-robot]

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 0ffdd05835508e283d6c8be3b22895513df63291

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: nojnhuh

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [nojnhuh]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[mboersma]

/lgtm

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (1fff4e0) 56.69% compared to head (9431d93) 56.68%.
Report is 3 commits behind head on release-1.11.

Additional details and impacted files

@@               Coverage Diff                @@
##           release-1.11    #4216      +/-   ##
================================================
- Coverage         56.69%   56.68%   -0.02%     
================================================
  Files               187      187              
  Lines             19212    19212              
================================================
- Hits              10893    10891       -2     
- Misses             7689     7691       +2     
  Partials            630      630              

Files	Coverage Δ
azure/scope/cluster.go	58.09% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 1 file with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.