Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

UMRELLA: Move Cluster API provider for DigitalOcean to Upstream #105

Closed
15 of 19 tasks
xmudrii opened this issue Oct 10, 2018 · 6 comments
Closed
15 of 19 tasks

UMRELLA: Move Cluster API provider for DigitalOcean to Upstream #105

xmudrii opened this issue Oct 10, 2018 · 6 comments
Labels
kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.

Comments

@xmudrii
Copy link
Member

xmudrii commented Oct 10, 2018

User story

On Cluster-API meetings held on 8/22 and 9/19, we have discussed about making Cluster API provider for DigitalOcean as an Cluster-API project and moving it from kubermatic to kubernetes-sigs organization.

The feedback overall is positive, but we need to fulfill the ownership requirement. The latest requirement is to have multiple owners from the multiple companies.

It is up to follow on this issue and to discuss how we can continue the process.

Prerequisites

Acceptance criteria

  • Cluster-API provider for DigitalOcean is upstreamed.
@xmudrii xmudrii added priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete. kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design. labels Oct 10, 2018
@xmudrii
Copy link
Member Author

xmudrii commented Oct 26, 2018

Testing does Prow works after migration.

/meow boxes

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

@xmudrii: cat image

In response to this:

Testing does Prow works after migration.

/meow boxes

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@xmudrii
Copy link
Member Author

xmudrii commented Oct 26, 2018

Relevant webhooks (Prow and CNCF CLA check) are enabled at the organization level.

CircleCI is enabled, but we need to make contexts work. The plan is to move to Prow as soon as possible.

I've updated issue with some more points that we should resolve before considering migration done.

@xmudrii
Copy link
Member Author

xmudrii commented Mar 10, 2019

@nikhita Is it okay to close this issue? I'm going to take care of updating the contributing guidelines later today and we can create a follow up for license auditing.

@nikhita
Copy link
Member

nikhita commented Mar 10, 2019

Sgtm.

/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link

@nikhita: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Sgtm.

/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
kind/design Categorizes issue or PR as related to design. priority/important-longterm Important over the long term, but may not be staffed and/or may need multiple releases to complete.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants