Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

✨ Implement VirtualMachine namingStrategy #3099

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2024
Merged

✨ Implement VirtualMachine namingStrategy #3099

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

sbueringer
Copy link
Member

@sbueringer sbueringer commented Jul 9, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #3100

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 9, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test ?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jul 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sbueringer: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-blocking-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-ci-latest-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-blocking-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-ci-latest-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-govmomi-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-supervisor-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-test-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-verify-main

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-apidiff-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-janitor-main

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-apidiff-main
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-blocking-main
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-blocking-main
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-test-main
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-verify-main

In response to this:

/test ?

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jul 9, 2024
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-implement-vm-naming-strategy branch 2 times, most recently from 98f0753 to a6af1e3 Compare July 9, 2024 15:20
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-supervisor-main

@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-implement-vm-naming-strategy branch from a6af1e3 to 506523e Compare July 9, 2024 19:26
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jul 9, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-supervisor-main

@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-implement-vm-naming-strategy branch from 188e47e to 947c924 Compare July 9, 2024 19:48
@sbueringer sbueringer changed the title [WIP] ✨ Implement VirtualMachine namingStrategy ✨ Implement VirtualMachine namingStrategy Jul 9, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 9, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-supervisor-main

@sbueringer sbueringer added this to the v1.11 milestone Jul 10, 2024
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-implement-vm-naming-strategy branch from 947c924 to 0268a0c Compare July 10, 2024 07:06
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-supervisor-main

@randomvariable
Copy link
Member

not done a deep review, mostly from an API perspective, but it's a

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 10, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 7587a2bc9ca5132e0f903e761f8429daa20069ce

@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-implement-vm-naming-strategy branch from 0268a0c to 5e46bad Compare July 10, 2024 09:32
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 10, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-supervisor-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

@fabriziopandini fixed / answered, PTAL :)

@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-implement-vm-naming-strategy branch from 5e46bad to 4f24911 Compare July 10, 2024 10:05
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

Added the comments, not sure about introducing randomness

@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-implement-vm-naming-strategy branch from 4f24911 to 97a3f5c Compare July 10, 2024 10:11
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-supervisor-main

@sbueringer
Implement VirtualMachine namingStrategy
ccfaf88 
Signed-off-by: Stefan Büringer buringerst@vmware.com
@sbueringer sbueringer force-pushed the pr-implement-vm-naming-strategy branch from 97a3f5c to ccfaf88 Compare July 10, 2024 11:12
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

Forgot to regenerate

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-govmomi-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-ci-latest-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-conformance-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-supervisor-upgrade-1-30-1-31-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-supervisor-main

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

@chrischdi I had this flake a few times: https://prow.k8s.io/view/gs/kubernetes-jenkins/pr-logs/pull/kubernetes-sigs_cluster-api-provider-vsphere/3099/pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-supervisor-main/1810995558580490240 Wondering if that's related to recent changes. Didn't get it before

@fabriziopandini
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

/hold for @chrischdi to take a look

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 10, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 10, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 07ebdde60387168eda2d647b1cf7ce2e10306d34

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 10, 2024
chrischdi
chrischdi reviewed Jul 11, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@chrischdi chrischdi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just an optional question :-)

/lgtm

internal/webhooks/vmware/vspheremachinetemplate.go Show resolved Hide resolved
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

Feel free to merge :-)

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member Author

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Jul 11, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit cb778af into kubernetes-sigs:main Jul 11, 2024
26 checks passed
@sbueringer sbueringer deleted the pr-implement-vm-naming-strategy branch July 11, 2024 13:36
@viveksyngh viveksyngh mentioned this pull request Dec 16, 2024
Merged
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left review comments

@chrischdi chrischdi chrischdi left review comments

@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon Awaiting requested review from killianmuldoon

@zhanggbj zhanggbj Awaiting requested review from zhanggbj

@randomvariable randomvariable Awaiting requested review from randomvariable

Assignees

@chrischdi chrischdi

@randomvariable randomvariable

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v1.11
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Allow customization of VirtualMachine names (supervisor-mode)
5 participants
@sbueringer @k8s-ci-robot @randomvariable @fabriziopandini @chrischdi