Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we update Cluster.Status.FailureDomains to ListType=map #2256

Closed
detiber opened this issue Feb 4, 2020 · 16 comments
Closed

Should we update Cluster.Status.FailureDomains to ListType=map #2256

detiber opened this issue Feb 4, 2020 · 16 comments
Labels
area/api Issues or PRs related to the APIs lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence.

Comments

@detiber
Copy link
Member

detiber commented Feb 4, 2020

If we adopt CRD v1, I'm wondering if we should also update FailureDomains from a map to a ListType=map (as is supported by controller-tools v0.2.5)?

This is a part of the server-side apply work that is being tracked here: kubernetes-sigs/structured-merge-diff#115

@vincepri
Copy link
Member

vincepri commented Feb 4, 2020

If we update, I'm all +1 for this given that I chose the map specifically because I didn't have guarantees for all the IDs in a list.

@vincepri
Copy link
Member

vincepri commented Feb 4, 2020

/milestone v0.3.0
/priority backlog

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. label Feb 4, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v0.3.0 milestone Feb 4, 2020
@vincepri
Copy link
Member

Blocked on CRDv1 update

@detiber
Copy link
Member Author

detiber commented Feb 13, 2020

@vincepri is this something we should now look at for the v0.3.0-rc.0 milestone?

My main concern here is that since we are introducing the type this upcoming release, if there is a chance we are going to want to change it we should do it before the release rather than after to avoid having to deal with a conversion issue down the line.

@vincepri
Copy link
Member

If someone can pick it up tomorrow, we can definitely add it to the RC. That said, it's fine to break things between RCs.

@detiber
Copy link
Member Author

detiber commented Feb 14, 2020

I'm not concerned as much with the RC.

/priority important-soon

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. label Feb 14, 2020
@vincepri
Copy link
Member

vincepri commented Mar 2, 2020

/milestone Next

Moving this out of the milestone due to timing and required API/code changes in CAPI and infrastructure providers

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot modified the milestones: v0.3.0, Next Mar 2, 2020
@vincepri
Copy link
Member

vincepri commented Mar 2, 2020

/area api

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/api Issues or PRs related to the APIs label Mar 2, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 31, 2020
@vincepri
Copy link
Member

vincepri commented Jun 1, 2020

/lifecycle frozen

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jun 1, 2020
@vincepri vincepri removed the priority/important-soon Must be staffed and worked on either currently, or very soon, ideally in time for the next release. label Oct 22, 2020
@vincepri
Copy link
Member

Yes, we should probably investigate this once we have better support for server side apply

@vincepri vincepri removed the lifecycle/frozen Indicates that an issue or PR should not be auto-closed due to staleness. label Feb 8, 2021
@vincepri
Copy link
Member

vincepri commented Feb 8, 2021

@detiber Server side apply support from controller runtime is still lacking, pushing this back a bit.

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label May 9, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jun 8, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closing this issue.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/api Issues or PRs related to the APIs lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants