-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🌱 Add MachinePools to autoscaler e2e test #10083
🌱 Add MachinePools to autoscaler e2e test #10083
Conversation
/test ? |
@willie-yao: The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:
The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:
Use
In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
46d0b59
to
4ef0996
Compare
...data/infrastructure-docker/main/cluster-template-topology-autoscaler/cluster-autoscaler.yaml
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
7bbccf2
to
fd2ba7a
Compare
fd2ba7a
to
be01bdf
Compare
8916733
to
ec3c1a9
Compare
387c56e
to
3d310d1
Compare
2ba4199
to
a3c05f6
Compare
a3c05f6
to
becac55
Compare
@sbueringer Figured out the issues and this should now be ready for review! I'm wondering if there's a more efficient way to test both MD and MP in this flow right now though... I'm having to remove the annotations and delete the previous scale up deployment to test MPs without unpredictable behavior from the autoscaler. |
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main |
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main Running a few times to ensure the test isn't flaky. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: b441bbf4d3fddd063e7b8644e64a77ff6e5ced01
|
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main Edit: unrelated flake, rerunning |
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main |
1 similar comment
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you very much for working on this
General approach lgtm, mostly just smaller findings
182a5ec
to
4c61ef6
Compare
/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main |
Really nice work! Thank you very much! /lgtm |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 0b80e69805e1a1d79e176c10636f8d3c18da6436
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What this PR does / why we need it:
This PR adds MachinePools to the autoscaler e2e tests. This is a follow-up task to enabling MachinePools in ClusterClass.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in
fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...)
format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):Fixes part of #10028
/area clusterclass