Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[release-1.7] 🐛 test: filter cluster-wide objects asserted in ResourceVersion tests to exclude objects of parallel tests #10570

Conversation

k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

This is an automated cherry-pick of #10560

/assign chrischdi

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.7 milestone May 7, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label May 7, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 7, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-cluster-api-apidiff-release-1-7 913ba7f link false /test pull-cluster-api-apidiff-release-1-7

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@sbueringer sbueringer added tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges. area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing labels May 7, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/needs-area PR is missing an area label label May 7, 2024
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@chrischdi would be good if we can pro-actively bump and adjust in CAPV once the next 1.7 release is out. But I guess dependabot will "notify" us automatically anyway? (by trying to bump CAPI on CAPV main)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 7, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: c5bd3c31bc0353251fa692d33bf7158d79b00de7

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 7, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 512dc36 into kubernetes-sigs:release-1.7 May 7, 2024
23 of 24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. tide/merge-method-squash Denotes a PR that should be squashed by tide when it merges.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants