Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🏃 Make getMachinesInCluster a helper function #1417

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 13, 2019

Conversation

tahsinrahman
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #1414

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Sep 12, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 12, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Sep 12, 2019

// getMachinesInCluster returns all of the Machine objects
// that belong to the cluster with given namespace/name
func getMachinesInCluster(ctx context.Context, c client.Client, namespace, name string) ([]*clusterv1.Machine, error) {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would like to see a test case for this function and perhaps a rename to getActiveMachinesInCluster. It could be read as "get all machines in a cluster" but the function is getting the non-deleted (is active the right word?) machines.

Regardless of a rename, this functionality should be reflected in the godoc.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

+1 to rename

@chuckha
Copy link
Contributor

chuckha commented Sep 13, 2019

nice!

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 13, 2019
@detiber
Copy link
Member

detiber commented Sep 13, 2019

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: detiber, tahsinrahman

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 13, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 9bb4967 into kubernetes-sigs:master Sep 13, 2019
@tahsinrahman tahsinrahman deleted the machine-cluster branch September 27, 2019 20:38
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Make getMachinesInCluster a helper function that both ClusterReconciler and MachineReconciler can use
5 participants