✨ Use KubeadmControlPlane in the e2e test

[chuckha]

Signed-off-by: Chuck Ha chuckh@vmware.com

/hold

I'm holding because this test requires Delete to be implemented before it can pass, but this is the direction the e2e framework is headed.

As KubeadmControlPlane is not strictly a required piece, I'm considering adding this as an additional test that folks don't have to use as they may not use the KubeadmControlPlane with their set up.

[chuckha]

/cc @akutz

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: chuckha

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [chuckha]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[chuckha]

/cc @wfernandes

[akutz]

Hi @chuckha,

Want me to run CAPV with this PR and see what happens?

[chuckha]

@akutz Ah, I should have stated why I tagged you. I mostly wanted you to see where this test was going and to make sure that CAPV was going to be using the kubeadm control plane controller -- but I think I'll make this its own test and keep the existing control-plane set up test that you're already using. That way providers can choose to use this test or not.

[chuckha]

thanks to @akutz, should remove the logs and such.