Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 add ClusterClass support for in-memory provider #8807

Merged

Conversation

ykakarap
Copy link
Contributor

@ykakarap ykakarap commented Jun 7, 2023

What this PR does / why we need it:

This PR adds ClusterClass support to the in-memory provider. It also adds clusterclass and cluster templates for this provider.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 7, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 7, 2023
@sbueringer sbueringer mentioned this pull request Jun 9, 2023
27 tasks
@ykakarap ykakarap force-pushed the pr-inmemory-provider-clusterclass branch from c7d8363 to d16c724 Compare June 12, 2023 16:42
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 12, 2023
@ykakarap ykakarap force-pushed the pr-inmemory-provider-clusterclass branch from d16c724 to 1cc6ac4 Compare June 12, 2023 16:50
@ykakarap ykakarap changed the title 🌱 [WIP] add ClusterClass support for in-memory provider 🌱 add ClusterClass support for in-memory provider Jun 12, 2023
Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm pending last comment

@ykakarap ykakarap force-pushed the pr-inmemory-provider-clusterclass branch from 1cc6ac4 to 87c4ee6 Compare June 13, 2023 16:04
@ykakarap
Copy link
Contributor Author

lgtm pending last comment

Addressed the last comment.

@ykakarap
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 13, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: d0927d93f317658524f69f0c55314f39273901af

Copy link
Member

@fabriziopandini fabriziopandini left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: fabriziopandini

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 13, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 238ca15 into kubernetes-sigs:main Jun 13, 2023
10 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.5 milestone Jun 13, 2023
@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

/area provider/infrastructure-in-memory

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/provider/infrastructure-in-memory Issues or PRs related to the in-memory infrastructure provider label Jun 27, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/provider/infrastructure-in-memory Issues or PRs related to the in-memory infrastructure provider cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants