Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Increase timeout for clusterclass rollout test #8897

Conversation

killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor

Increase the timeout for the comparisons in this test to see if they have an impact on the flake in #8747

I'm not certain what's causing the drop in speed here, but looking at the artifacts of the failing tests the cert annotation is correctly reconciled on the control plane machine, but this happens after the timeout completes.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Jun 21, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 21, 2023
@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon changed the title Increase timeout for clusterclass rollout test 🐛 Increase timeout for clusterclass rollout test Jun 21, 2023
@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/area e2e-testing

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing label Jun 21, 2023
@@ -279,7 +279,7 @@ func assertClusterObjects(ctx context.Context, clusterProxy framework.ClusterPro
assertMachineSetsMachines(g, clusterObjects, cluster)

By("All cluster objects have the right labels, annotations and selectors")
}, 10*time.Second, 1*time.Second).Should(Succeed())
}, 30*time.Second, 1*time.Second).Should(Succeed())
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sbueringer do you know of any changes recently that could have caused this? The flake only popped up on June 16.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

But totally different controller

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Let's go ahead with the slightly longer timeout as it doesn't actually matter if the annotation shows up after 10 seconds or 10 hours. Let's take a closer look if the flake persists

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 21, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: e73075de2bc792d19a3a08a8d1f9ea1c27ced354

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 21, 2023
@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Interesting flake

/retest

Signed-off-by: killianmuldoon <kmuldoon@vmware.com>
@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon force-pushed the pr-increase-cluster-rollout-timeout branch from c3a6c96 to 50f8991 Compare June 21, 2023 16:06
@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon changed the title 🐛 Increase timeout for clusterclass rollout test Increase timeout for clusterclass rollout test Jun 21, 2023
@killianmuldoon killianmuldoon changed the title Increase timeout for clusterclass rollout test 🐛 Increase timeout for clusterclass rollout test Jun 21, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 03830a5 into kubernetes-sigs:main Jun 21, 2023
16 of 18 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.5 milestone Jun 21, 2023
@killianmuldoon
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherry-pick release-1.4

This issue is now cropping up on 1.4. I'm not sure of the root cause as there have not been many commits to that branch.

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@killianmuldoon: new pull request created: #8937

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.4

This issue is now cropping up on 1.4. I'm not sure of the root cause as there have not been many commits to that branch.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants