Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🌱 Release v1.6.0 #9807

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 5, 2023
Merged

Conversation

g-gaston
Copy link
Contributor

@g-gaston g-gaston commented Dec 4, 2023

/area release

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/release Issues or PRs related to releasing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Dec 4, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Dec 4, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@CecileRobertMichon CecileRobertMichon left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/hold

- Metrics: Hack/observability: add capi_machine_status_certificatesexpirydate metric (#9084)
- Metrics: Hack: bump kube-state-metrics and prometheus charts (#9352)
- Release: Add additional blocks to release note generation (#9247)
- Release: Add adilGhaffarDev to release-team owner alias (#9718)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Side note: I wonder if need a separate category for release, testing, etc. since there are so many "other" changes

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also dependency

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Dec 4, 2023
Copy link
Member

@furkatgofurov7 furkatgofurov7 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, one small nit below:

CHANGELOG/v1.6.0.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG/v1.6.0.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG/v1.6.0.md Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG/v1.6.0.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
CHANGELOG/v1.6.0.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
- Dependency: Bump github.com/fatih/color from 1.15.0 to 1.16.0 (#9681)
- Dependency: Bump github.com/go-logr/logr from 1.2.4 to 1.3.0 (#9644)
- Dependency: Bump github.com/google/go-cmp from 0.5.9 to 0.6.0 (#9562)
- Dependency: Bump github.com/onsi/ginkgo/v2 from 2.13.0 to 2.13.1 (#9716)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Q: Could it be that we only have one changelog entry for dependencies that have been bumped multiple times?

E.g. ginkgo in release-1.5 was not v2.13.0 as it seems here in the changelog

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, we do remove "duplicated" entries for the same module
It's documented in the release process
We can discuss a process change, I don't mind having multiple entries for the same dependency

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Definitely let's not delay this release for it.

The main thing I don't like is that it now looks like we upgraded only from 2.13.0 to 2.13.1 (even though the source versions are totally different).
In the past I merged entries by modifying the source / target version to capture all bumps + add all the PRs.

As nobody actually cares about the bump PRs I think the ideal solution would be to be able to just generate the list of bumped dependencies and drop the individual PRs entirely from the release notes. This would give us also a more accurate and complete list of bumps (compare with what k/k is doing).

In any case, let's definitely keep it as is for now, but it might be worth a follow-up issue.

@furkatgofurov7
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 5, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 988fe67252c26f9468f9ea399e779eefeb33d48b

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Thank you!!

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: CecileRobertMichon, sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 5, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit d2856ec into kubernetes-sigs:main Dec 5, 2023
17 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.7 milestone Dec 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/release Issues or PRs related to releasing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants