Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We鈥檒l occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

馃悰 test: Fix finalizers test to not only rely on namespaced name #9891

Merged

Conversation

chrischdi
Copy link
Member

What this PR does / why we need it:

#9833 introduced that objects like e.g. machine and dockermachine use the same name.

The finalizers test relied on the name for indexing objects which is not possible anymore after the above change.

This fix adds the kind to the index used in the test to not mix up types.

Fixes this flakes

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #

/area testing

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the area/testing Issues or PRs related to testing label Dec 18, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 18, 2023
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/retitle 馃悰 test: Fix finalizers test to not only rely on namespaced name

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot changed the title Fix finalizers test to not only rely on namespaced name 馃悰 test: Fix finalizers test to not only rely on namespaced name Dec 18, 2023
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/test help

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@chrischdi: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-build-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-dualstack-and-ipv6-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-mink8s-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-workload-upgrade-1-28-latest-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-test-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-test-mink8s-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-verify-main

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-e2e-scale-main-experimental

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-cluster-api-apidiff-main
  • pull-cluster-api-build-main
  • pull-cluster-api-e2e-main
  • pull-cluster-api-test-main
  • pull-cluster-api-verify-main

In response to this:

/test help

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member Author

/test pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

@sbueringer sbueringer added area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing and removed area/testing Issues or PRs related to testing labels Dec 18, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 18, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: 9ae370b8089bf93f405930cdfc362838f949f670

@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

Failed because of the other flake otherwise green

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 18, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/override pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@sbueringer: Overrode contexts on behalf of sbueringer: pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

In response to this:

/override pull-cluster-api-e2e-full-main

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@kubernetes-sigs kubernetes-sigs deleted a comment from k8s-ci-robot Dec 18, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit fda0b08 into kubernetes-sigs:main Dec 18, 2023
22 checks passed
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.7 milestone Dec 18, 2023
@sbueringer
Copy link
Member

/cherry-pick release-1.6

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot

@sbueringer: new pull request created: #10004

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.6

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/e2e-testing Issues or PRs related to e2e testing cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants