Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🐛 Do not set PatchType if patch is empty #1299

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 17, 2020

Conversation

tatsuhiro-t
Copy link
Contributor

@tatsuhiro-t tatsuhiro-t commented Dec 16, 2020

In admission v1, API server requires that Patch and PatchType are both
provided or none are provided. Meanwhile, admission v1beta1 does not
have this kind of requirement.

In controller-runtime, PatchResponseFromRaw sets PatchType regardless
of the existence of patch. If patch is empty, a response contains
only PatchType and API server does not like it. Webhook call fails.

This change fixes this issue by not setting PatchType if patch is
empty.

Fixes #1295

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/invalid-commit-message Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid commit message. label Dec 16, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @tatsuhiro-t!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/controller-runtime has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Dec 16, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @tatsuhiro-t. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Dec 16, 2020
In admission v1, API server requires that Patch and PatchType are both
provided or none are provided.  Meanwhile, admission v1beta1 does not
have this kind of requirement.

In controller-runtime, PatchResponseFromRaw sets PatchType regardless
of the existence of patch.  If patch is empty, a response contains
only PatchType and API server does not like it.  Webhook call fails.

This change fixes this issue by not setting PatchType if patch is
empty.
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/invalid-commit-message Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid commit message. label Dec 16, 2020
@tatsuhiro-t
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @gerred

Copy link
Member

@alvaroaleman alvaroaleman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

Thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 17, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alvaroaleman, tatsuhiro-t

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 17, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit cf7ac88 into kubernetes-sigs:master Dec 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

v0.7.0: Handling empty patch in PatchResponseFromRaw
4 participants