Fake client.Update() should not store omit empty Status fields

[berlin-ab]

[x] - solve for typed object Update()
[ ] - solve for unstructured object Update()

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @berlin-ab. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: berlin-ab
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign fillzpp for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[troy0820]

/hold

I know this is a draft to show that the test fails with the logic you expect, however adding hold to help with triage and not a work in progress PR.

[berlin-ab]

I know this is a draft to show that the test fails with the logic you expect, however adding hold to help with triage and not a work in progress PR.

Yeah, thanks for clarifying. This is not an in-progress PR, but more of a proof of concept/bug.