-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[release-0.19] 🐛fix(controller): support WaitForSync in custom TypedSyncingSource #3087
[release-0.19] 🐛fix(controller): support WaitForSync in custom TypedSyncingSource #3087
Conversation
…ubernetes-sigs#3084) * 🐛fix(controller): use generic WaitForSync There is already support for defining `TypedSyncingSource` but the original code still checks for the original `SyncingSource` before callign `WaitForSync(ctx)` which does not work for custom typed controller. this fix should be backported to v0.19 * test
Hi @tareksha. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Thx! /ok-to-test |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 3d50a4d61465390b27bde2b864c4cef7e7db4baa
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: sbueringer, tareksha The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
hi @sbueringer when is a new patch release of v0.19 expected? |
@tareksha Now |
this is a cherry pick of #3084