Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Try #2: Support encrypted DNS txt records #1538

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Try #2: Support encrypted DNS txt records #1538

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

HansK-p
Copy link
Contributor

@HansK-p HansK-p commented Apr 18, 2020

Once again creating a PR for this change. I managed to foobar my previous PR earlier today as my git experience is extremely limited.

We are running on a fork of External-DNS where txt records are encrypted. The encryption is an internal security requirement as we are not allowed to leak information about internal infrastructure through publicly available txt records.

It is a pain to keep a forked version of External-DNS up to date and it would be really nice if this PR could be considered (or at least looked at). The previous PR was created on December 6th 2019 and was absolutely, totally and completely ignored by the project maintainers for more than 4 months.

We are looking for other solutions, but this forked version of External-DNS is currently our best option. So we really hope txt record encryption will be included as a security feature in External-DNS. It doesn't mater a lot for us this code is used as a base for implementation - as long as it is implemented.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 18, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: HansK-p
To complete the pull request process, please assign njuettner
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @njuettner in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@HansK-p
Copy link
Contributor Author

HansK-p commented Apr 18, 2020

/assign @njuettner

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label May 11, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@HansK-p: PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@HansK-p
Copy link
Contributor Author

HansK-p commented May 20, 2020

I'll rebase when asked to do so by a human :) or when we upgrade our own installation. So the PR will be rebased when needed.......

@Hugome
Copy link
Contributor

Hugome commented Aug 4, 2020

+1 for this feature. I also need sometime this kind of ""overkill"" security feature for sensitive project. And for the moment I cannot use external-dns in these projects :(.
(And +1 @HansK-p nice clean code & tests :) maybe to be picky this miss a little of docs/example ?)

@seanmalloy
Copy link
Member

/kind feature

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Aug 19, 2020
@HansK-p
Copy link
Contributor Author

HansK-p commented Sep 4, 2020

And please ping me if I should solve conflicts. It's a small pain to solve those conflicts, so I will only do it when we decide to upgrade our modified internal external-dns installation or when asked by a human.

@seanmalloy
Copy link
Member

And please ping me if I should solve conflicts. It's a small pain to solve those conflicts, so I will only do it when we decide to upgrade our modified internal external-dns installation or when asked by a human.

@HansK-p thanks for the heads up. I can't get to this PR right now. We will let you know when we are ready to review it. Thanks!

@fejta-bot
Copy link

Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale.
Stale issues rot after an additional 30d of inactivity and eventually close.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Dec 3, 2020
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Stale issues rot after 30d of inactivity.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.
Rotten issues close after an additional 30d of inactivity.

If this issue is safe to close now please do so with /close.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/lifecycle rotten

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. and removed lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. labels Jan 2, 2021
@fejta-bot
Copy link

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@fejta-bot: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

Rotten issues close after 30d of inactivity.
Reopen the issue with /reopen.
Mark the issue as fresh with /remove-lifecycle rotten.

Send feedback to sig-testing, kubernetes/test-infra and/or fejta.
/close

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lifecycle/rotten Denotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants