Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Enable azure_private_dns to work with non "AzurePublicCloud" clouds #1578

Conversation

daddonpa
Copy link
Contributor

The PrivateZoneClient by default communicates to the AzurePublicCloud resource manager endpoint.

To make the azure_private_dns work with other clouds like

  • AzureUSGovernmentCloud
  • AzureChinaCloud
  • AzureGermanCloud

it should use the endpoint specific to the selected cloud.

This change makes it behave like the NewAzureProvider from azure.go

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label May 14, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from linki and Raffo May 14, 2020 19:16
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @daddonpa!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/external-dns 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/external-dns has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. label May 14, 2020
@daddonpa daddonpa force-pushed the feature/azure-private-dns-non-global-cloud branch 2 times, most recently from bf8576a to d7f54c9 Compare May 14, 2020 19:29
@daddonpa
Copy link
Contributor Author

I signed it

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels May 14, 2020
@Raffo
Copy link
Contributor

Raffo commented May 16, 2020

@daddonpa is there a way we can add a test or prove this behaviour?

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 18, 2020
@daddonpa
Copy link
Contributor Author

Added test to verify that NewAzurePrivateDNSProvider will use the ResourceManagerEndpoint of the configured cloud.

I am not sure if my way of testing (setting environment variable and casting an interface to the type I know it should be) is fine for go in general and this repository in particular but I could not find a better way to do it.

The same test can be added for NewAzureProvider where the behaviour is already implemented.

@daddonpa
Copy link
Contributor Author

@Raffo is there something else I should add?

@daddonpa
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @njuettner

@seanmalloy
Copy link
Member

/kind feature

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. label Aug 19, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@tariq1890 tariq1890 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 20, 2020
@seanmalloy
Copy link
Member

@daddonpa can you rebase your PR to pull in the latest changes from master? I see that the new GItHub action CI check did not run for this PR. Thanks!

@seanmalloy
Copy link
Member

/hold

Needs a rebase before it can be merged.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 22, 2020
@daddonpa daddonpa force-pushed the feature/azure-private-dns-non-global-cloud branch from 6106ef5 to 83d7364 Compare August 22, 2020 13:16
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 22, 2020
@daddonpa
Copy link
Contributor Author

@seanmalloy rebased commits onto master

@seanmalloy
Copy link
Member

/hold cancel

@tariq1890 please review one more time now that the PR has been rebased. Thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Aug 22, 2020
@tariq1890
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 25, 2020
Copy link
Member

@njuettner njuettner left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Please add you PR to the CHANGELOG.md, we can merge it afterwards

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 25, 2020
@daddonpa
Copy link
Contributor Author

@njuettner Added Pull Request to CHANGELOG.md

@seanmalloy
Copy link
Member

/assign @Raffo @njuettner

@seanmalloy
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Aug 25, 2020
@Raffo
Copy link
Contributor

Raffo commented Aug 30, 2020

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: daddonpa, Raffo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Aug 30, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 8381b4c into kubernetes-sigs:master Aug 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants