Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: remove split of host/port #2783

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 15, 2022

Conversation

scottd018
Copy link
Contributor

@scottd018 scottd018 commented Jun 1, 2022

This commit removes the need to split the host and port as the
dns client configuration was refactored in v0.12.0 to no longer
require this.

Signed-off-by: Dustin Scott sdustin@vmware.com

Description

This removes the need to split the host and port. The refactor that went into v0.12.0 changed the methodology that was used to create the handle and now no longer requires the hostname separated from the port.

Fixes #2778

Checklist

  • Unit tests updated
  • End user documentation updated

NOTE: docs not required to be updated. Unit tests are sufficiently complex that it would not make sense to put it in this PR (unit tests require a functional KDC server to interact with) - opened issue #2784 to address this.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/invalid-commit-message Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid commit message. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 1, 2022
@scottd018 scottd018 changed the title fix: Fixes #2778, remove split of host/port fix: remove split of host/port Jun 1, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/invalid-commit-message Indicates that a PR should not merge because it has an invalid commit message. label Jun 1, 2022
This commit removes the need to split the host and port as the
dns client configuration was refactored in v0.12.0 to no longer
require this.

Signed-off-by: Dustin Scott <dustin.scott18@gmail.com>
@Raffo
Copy link
Contributor

Raffo commented Jun 15, 2022

/approve
/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 15, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Raffo, scottd018

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jun 15, 2022
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 1de31c2 into kubernetes-sigs:master Jun 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

RFC2136 Error "missing port in address" in 0.12.0. The same config worked in 0.11.0.
3 participants