Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use right version for exoscale/egoscale #3461

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2023
Merged

Conversation

Raffo
Copy link
Contributor

@Raffo Raffo commented Mar 8, 2023

Description

Fixes #3460.

This PR uses the latest officially released version of exoscale/egoscale, ignoring the broken v1.19 that is still published and that was upgraded by dependabot, but that is not working due to a SHA mismatch. I am not sure what the release strategy is for exoscale/egoscale and it seems a bad idea to me to leave a release published that we are somewhat not supposed to use, but nonetheless, we will pin to v0.97.0 which is a legit release and ignore dependabot for now.

/cc @szuecs

Signed-off-by: Raffaele Di Fazio <difazio.raffaele@gmail.com>
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested a review from szuecs March 8, 2023 17:21
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Raffo

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Mar 8, 2023
github.com/exoscale/egoscale v1.19.0
github.com/exoscale/egoscale v0.97.0
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This looks like a downgrade, but it is actually only sticking to the latest "valid" release, as described in #3460 .

@szuecs
Copy link
Contributor

szuecs commented Mar 8, 2023

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 8, 2023
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit f4acab1 into master Mar 8, 2023
@Raffo Raffo deleted the raffo/fix-egoscale branch March 8, 2023 17:37
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Building from scratch fails with dependency error (egoscale)
3 participants